Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [News] Why GNU/Linux Requires No Security as "Addon"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

____/ JeffM on Friday 12 Mar 2010 00:47 : \____

> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>> Why You Donât Need Anti-Virus Software For Linux
>>|much like the highly-moderated articles of Wikipedia
>>|that require membership and has an approval process
>>|for changes made to locked articles,
>>
> Well,  that addresses *apps* and *repositories*,
> but it completely misses the core issue:
> Linux (the OS kernel) uses the Unix **permissions** meme
> that has been around since 1969
> (more than 2 decades before M$ got into the OS business).
> 
> It's not like Redmond didn't have a working model to copy.

One Microsoft Way says that you need to ignore standards and make up your own,
then patent these.

- -- 
		~~ Best of wishes

Roy S. Schestowitz      |  {Hide sig}    {Show sig}    >{Close Application}<
http://Schestowitz.com  |  Open Prospects   |     PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Tasks: 140 total,   1 running, 139 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
      http://iuron.com - knowledge engine, not a search engine
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkuaVoEACgkQU4xAY3RXLo7RawCfd5YkY7KMHH5GueNii+VyVURH
1n8AnAz3QWxTs21dmieUynsQF4RYul+Y
=OXtq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index