Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] Billions Would be Saved With Open Access

  • Subject: [News] Billions Would be Saved With Open Access
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 08:20:44 +0000
  • Followup-to: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • User-agent: KNode/4.3.1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

U.S. systemic savings from a full shift to OA: $3.4 billion

,----[ Quote ]
| King argues for an open access system via article processing fees, 
| fully paid by the federal government. It is noteworthy that King's 
| estimate is that this would cost, in a worst-case scenario, an 
| increase of less than 1% of what the U.S. federal government 
| spends on research grants right now. King acknowledges the
| unlikelihood of this scenario. Average cost-per-article of 
| $1,500 and $2,500 U.S. scenarios are employed; the additional 
| cost for 100% funding of articles would be $427 million (at 
| $1,500 per article) or $712 million (at $2,500 per article). 
| King estimates that academic and special libraries could, 
| together, save an estimate $4.1 billion per year.
`----

http://poeticeconomics.blogspot.com/2010/03/us-systemic-savings-from-full-shift-to.html

An Approach to Open Access Author Payment

,----[ Quote ]
| There have been hundreds of articles in 
| recent years exhorting the strengths and 
| warning of the weaknesses of Open Access 
| through author payment. This article 
| discusses a few of the favorable and 
| unfavorable issues and proposes an approach 
| that takes advantage of the favorable aspects 
| and overcomes some of the unfavorable ones. 
| It requires extensive government support, 
| which may or may not be feasible, but the 
| approach is presented here nevertheless. Some 
| evidence is given for the potential savings 
| that would be achieved by scientists, 
| publishers and libraries in the US.
`----

http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march10/king/03king.html

On Open Data, Open Source, UK Libel Law and Evidence-based Sustainability

,----[ Quote ]
| As is often the case, someone asks for a 
| written answer to a question, but then fails 
| to use the material. The great thing about 
| blogs is that they make it very easy to make 
| sure such content isnât wasted. So here are 
| some thoughts on the GreenMonk  mission and 
| sustainability more broadly.
| 
| We set up Greenmonk with the explicit 
| intention of lobbying for open data and open 
| source for better environmental outcomes.
| 
| [...]
| 
| In the UK, libel law is regularly abused to 
| shut down dissenting voices. Its not just 
| randy footballers that try and abuse the law. 
| Pushing back against the status quo are 
| organisations such as Sense About Science, 
| which is backing the National Petition for 
| Libel Law Reform.
`----

http://greenmonk.net/on-open-data-open-source-uk-libel-law-and-evidence-based-sustainability/

No Panaceas! A Q&A with Elinor Ostrom 

,----[ Quote ]
| Ostromâs seminal book, Governing the Commons: 
| The Evolution of Institutions for Collective 
| Action, was published in 1990. But her 
| research on common property goes back to the 
| early 1960s, when she wrote her dissertation 
| on groundwater in California. In 1973 she and 
| her husband, Vincent Ostrom, founded the 
| Workshop in Political Theory and Policy 
| Analysis at Indiana University. In the 
| intervening years, the Workshop has produced 
| hundreds of studies of the conditions in 
| which communities self-organize to solve 
| common problems. Ostrom currently serves as 
| professor of political science at Indiana 
| University and senior research director of 
| the Workshop.
| 
| Fran Korten: When you first learned that you 
| had won the Nobel Prize in Economics, were 
| you surprised?
| 
| Elinor Ostrom: Yes. It was quite surprising. 
| I was both happy and relieved.
| 
| Fran: Why relieved?
| 
| Elinor: Well, relieved in that I was doing a 
| bunch of research through the years that many 
| people thought was very radical and people 
| didnât like. As a person who does 
| interdisciplinary work, I didnât fit 
| anywhere. I was relieved that, after all 
| these years of struggle, someone really 
| thought it did add up. Thatâs very nice.
`----

http://shareable.net/blog/no-panaceas-a-qa-with-elinor-ostrom

ONS Solubility Book: Edition 3 with Notebook Archive 

,----[ Quote ]
| We've been trying for some time to find a way 
| to conveniently take a snapshot of our Open 
| Notebooks and all associated raw data files. 
| This could serve as a way to back up all of 
| our work as well as provide a means of 
| finding out the state of knowledge for a 
| project at a given moment in time. There is 
| also a tremendous benefit to confidently 
| using the best of free hosted Web2.0 services 
| out there (e.g. GoogleDocs and Wikispaces) 
| without being concerned with changes in 
| policies or access down the road.
`----

http://usefulchem.blogspot.com/2010/02/ons-solubility-book-edition-3-with.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkukhVwACgkQU4xAY3RXLo4bgwCfZwyn3MvI2kHLr+QpSXwA2sUR
ZK0AnimOFFImYzeEyNo3FK3VC+QERkOr
=0J5y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index