Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] Intellectual Monopolists Want to Intrude People's Computers

  • Subject: [News] Intellectual Monopolists Want to Intrude People's Computers
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2010 08:46:16 +0100
  • Followup-to: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • User-agent: KNode/4.3.1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

What's inside your home is yours, except computer files

,----[ Quote ]
| Iâve written two controversial pieces 
| concerning intellectual property. One with 
| the view that if it should come to pass 
| that the MPAA / RIAA / xyz advocating new 
| enforcement law to monitor users of the 
| Internet and are found to have illegal 
| copyright material, then who should 
| regulate it, in which I proposed that the 
| FCC is one possible solution.
| 
| I wrote immediately thereafter that 
| intellectual property associations are 
| going way overboard and border on the 
| absurd? Just because file sharing is going 
| over the internet, should these 
| associations  have the right to find you 
| guilty, have multiple different mediums 
| content distribution, many of which are 
| free to the public while being able to sue 
| you for infringement? They need to change 
| their business models.
| 
| This week, 50,000 new lawsuits have been 
| filed against downloaders. Itâs only going 
| to get worse.
`----

http://government.zdnet.com/?p=8559

Stop The Digital Economy Bill

https://secure.38degrees.org.uk/page/contribute/DigitalEconomyBillAd

Usenet â The new(old) target? â Newzbin fails to convince court?

,----[ Quote ]
| Usenet is now looking to be the new target 
| for those seeking civil recourse for their 
| material being shared without 
| authorisation.
| 
| [...]
| 
| So we repeat the cycle (yet again) of 
| sucess, failure, sucess, failure (in 
| respect of filesharing cases) and whilst 
| both sides take their delight in their 
| respective victories, the filesharing issue 
| continues and damages the industry.  Mark 
| my words as we see more aggressive attacks 
| on filesharing, we will merely see a change 
| of technology, I donât think the industry 
| can keep up with the innovation nor can law 
| have the remit to cover all facets of 
| modern tech.
`----

http://openbytes.wordpress.com/2010/03/30/usenet-the-newold-target-newzbin-fails-to-convince-court/


Recent:

The Day Democracy Died: DEB

,----[ Quote ]
| The Lib Dem amendments I mentioned in my
| previous posts - alongside some equally
| sensible amendments designed in particular
| to stop every search engine being blocked
| under clause 18 - were rejected by the
| Government this afternoon in the Lords, on
| what appeared to be legally spurious
| grounds, to the clear dismay and disquiet
| of the Lords.
|
| Shortly thereafter it appears some kind of
| deal was done whereby the Government
| announced they would bring forward
| unspecified changes to the disputed clause
| 18 at "wash up" - the pre election stage
| where legislation is pushed through with no
| opportunity for MPs to propose amendments
| or even , perhaps, make comments in debate,
| let alone scrutinise. It seems all
| opportunity for democratic amendment to the
| Bill has now come to an end.
|
| [...]
|
| There is one way forward for here for
| democratic scrutiny to be restored, and
| that is for MPs to demand a debate at the
| Commons stage of the Bill and refuse to
| allow this messed up mockery of legislation
| to pass on the nod. Write to your MP and
| demand this. Go on one of the rallies and
| flash mobs planned for next week by ORG.
| Write to the BPI and tell then that you did
| not vote for them to run the country. Make
| your voice heard.
`----

http://blogscript.blogspot.com/2010/03/day-democracy-died-deb.html


Yesterday in the Lords: DEB

http://blogscript.blogspot.com/2010/03/yesterday-in-lords-deb.html


UK Lords Pass Digital Economy Bill, Now Look To Rush It Through Commons

http://techdirt.com/articles/20100316/0338248581.shtml
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAku1oMgACgkQU4xAY3RXLo44qgCfRborbLbFlLnl5pmMSwoRTPQy
DcQAnj6j48OQISH2UdW8p+tCn5lduZL+
=ku3H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index