Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] [Rival] Only Fools and Horses Would Run GNU/Linux Under Windows

  • Subject: [News] [Rival] Only Fools and Horses Would Run GNU/Linux Under Windows
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2010 11:07:16 +0100
  • Followup-to: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • User-agent: KNode/4.3.1
Hash: SHA1

Microsoft Updates Linux Code


Games Microsoft plays

,----[ Quote ]
| Microsoft want's people to run Linux on top 
| of Windows so that their software retains 
| control of Linux and retains top 
| performance rather than have to deal with 
| customers doing the reverse.
| While it is true that Greg K-H, who has 
| done most of the fixing, is getting money 
| from Microsoft indirectly through Novell, 
| perhaps he does expect at least a little 
| help from Microsoft proper: 
| http://www.linux-magazine.com/Online/News/Kroah-Ha rtman-
| Remove-Hyper-V-Driver-from-Kernel
| Of course, true to form, Microsoft trumpets 
| that "the community" has received their 
| code well because "the community" has 
| submitted many patches to help fix the 
| code.


Art Cancro - Subject: Dear Microsoft

,----[ Quote ]
| Seriously, is there anyone left in the 
| world who still trusts Microsoft? I can't 
| imagine any data center manager in his 
| right mind would want to virtualize Linux 
| on top of Windows. (And anyone who's 
| serious about virtualization is running 
| bare metal hypervisors such as VMware ESX 
| anyway.)
| The only people I could see using this are 
| small-time Windows fanboys who have to 
| grudgingly deploy some sort of Linux 
| application that they need - either because 
| it only runs on Linux or because it's 
| delivered as a virtual appliance.


MS the cancer of computing 

,----[ Quote ]
| Yes any *SERIOUS* admin is running *BARE 
| METAL* hypervisors. MS just wants control 
| if it isn't dependable running on plain 
| servers why would I want it controlling 
| VM's? just the opposite would be the 
| beneficial way .... GNU/Linux controlling 
| MS VM's at least I know that "my base" will 
| be solid 

Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index