Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] Katherine Hobson on "Controversial" Gene Patents, Microsoft Highly Dependent on Software Patents

  • Subject: [News] Katherine Hobson on "Controversial" Gene Patents, Microsoft Highly Dependent on Software Patents
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 13:55:25 +0100
  • Followup-to: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • User-agent: KNode/4.3.1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Think Gene Patents Are Controversial Now? Just Wait

,----[ Quote ]
| Of course, the $1,000 genome is likely 
| years away, and those who favor exclusive 
| patents on diagnostics say theyâre 
| necessary for companies to make their money 
| back on research and development.
| 
| But exclusive patents may already be 
| keeping some patients in the dark, the WSJ 
| article says. It describes a new method of 
| genetic testing called chromosomal 
| microarrays that can pick up chromosomal 
| abnormalities in the genome. Whatâs a 
| doctor to do if that kind of analysis 
| encompasses a gene thatâs already patented 
| â tell the patient or stick to the letter 
| of the law?
`----

http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2010/04/14/think-gene-patents-are-controversial-now-just-wait/

Microsoft stocks Washington's patent portfolio

,----[ Quote ]
| Eighty-five percent of Microsoft's patents 
| were for software -- and patenting software 
| remains intensely controversial. 
`----

http://blog.oregonlive.com/siliconforest/2010/04/microsoft_fuels_washingtons_st.html


Recent:

EU Patent system taken away from European Court of Justice

,----[ Quote ]
| Business Europe fiercely opposes a role for
| the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in
| patent law. During a conference in the
| European Parliament in Strasbourg, Thierry
| Sueur of Business Europe disclosed the
| United Patent Litigation System (UPLS) was
| aimed to keep the ECJ away from
| interpreting substantive patent law under
| the European Patent Convention (EPC),
| particularly for software patentability.
|
| Hartmut Pilch analysed in 2007: "In July
| 2005, after several failed attempts to
| legalise software patents in Europe, the
| patent establishment changed its strategy.
| Instead of explicitly seeking to sanction
| the patentability of software, they are now
| seeking to create a central European patent
| court, which would establish and enforce
| patentability rules in their favor, without
| any possibility of correction by competing
| courts or democratically elected
| legislators."
|
| Benjamin Henrion, President of the FFII,
| comprehends their concerns: "While the US
| Supreme Court can review decisions of the
| Texas patent courts, this recourse would
| not be available to Europeans. A newly
| created UPLS patent court would have the
| final say over software patentability."
`----

http://press.ffii.org/Press%20releases/EU%20patent%20system%20taken%20away%20from%20European%20Court%20of%20Justice
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkvNpD4ACgkQU4xAY3RXLo5RXACgrMxKW32I7Jek9zNowdp59oko
3S8AoKKGizZpzSUJ9h+z3/Ptgj5pl79c
=g3ux
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index