Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] [Rival] New Reasons to Boycott Apple: Attack on Freedoms, Bloggers, Standards, Ogg, Literature...

  • Subject: [News] [Rival] New Reasons to Boycott Apple: Attack on Freedoms, Bloggers, Standards, Ogg, Literature...
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 02 May 2010 00:31:01 +0100
  • Followup-to: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • User-agent: KNode/4.4.2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

EFF, Wired, MarketWatch, Yahoo: Outrage ensues over Appleâs reporting of iPhone prototype theft

http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2010/04/28/eff-wired-marketwatch-yahoo-outrage-ensues-over-apples-reporting-of-iphone-prototype-theft/

Boycott Apple. Boycott Everyone.

,----[ Quote ]
| This is an abuse of police powers, an 
| exercise in intimidation. The message is 
| clear: annoy Apple, and Apple will crush you 
| like a bug. A more appropriate response 
| would have been dueling lawyers firing 
| subpoenas at each other and racking up the 
| appropriate number of billable hours. The 
| most appropriate response would have been 
| "Oops, we goofed, we let one of our trade 
| secrets out, we need to be more careful."
| 
| Trade secrets are exposed all the time. 
| Execs lose things. Employees blab. Some 
| journalists feel it is beneath their dignity 
| to take advantage of such lapses. But it is 
| not our job to protect their trade secrets, 
| and especially not in this era of 
| intellectual property madness where the 
| balance of power is tipped heavily into the 
| hands of big business, and every last little 
| thing that displeases the corporate 
| overlords is criminalized.
| 
| [...]
| 
| At best, in my un-legal but common-sense 
| opinion, this is a minor civil matter, and 
| surely not a criminal case that warrants a 
| door-busting raid and possible felony 
| charges. Both Mr. Hogan and Mr. Chen face 
| possible felony charges, which is utterly 
| insane.
`----

http://www.linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2010-04-30-031-35-OP-BZ-AP

Apple To Shut Down Lala On May 31

http://apple.slashdot.org/story/10/04/30/1354246/Apple-To-Shut-Down-Lala-On-May-31

Open Letter to Steve Jobs 

,----[ Quote ]
| May I remind you that H.264 is not an open 
| standard? This video codec is covered by 
| patents, and âvendors and commercial users 
| of products which make use of H.264/AVC are 
| expected to pay patent licensing royalties 
| for the patented technologyâ (ref). This is 
| why Mozilla Firefox and Opera have not 
| adopted this video codec for their HTML5 
| implementation, and decided to chose Theora 
| as a sustainable and open alternative.
| 
| [...]
| 
|     From: Steve Jobs
|     To: Hugo Roy
|     Subject: Re:Open letter to Steve Jobs: 
|     Thoughts on Flash
|     Date 30/04/2010 15:21:17
| 
|     All video codecs are covered by patents. 
|     A patent pool is being assembled to go 
|     after Theora and other âopen sourceâ 
|     codecs now. Unfortunately, just because 
|     something is open source, it doesnât 
|     mean or guarantee that it doesnât 
|     infringe on others patents. An open 
|     standard is different from being royalty 
|     free or open source.
| 
|     Sent from my iPad 
| 
| Since it was an open letter, I think I have 
| the right to publish his answer.
`----

http://blogs.fsfe.org/hugo/2010/04/open-letter-to-steve-jobs/

Steve Jobs Hints At Theora Lawsuit

http://yro.slashdot.org/story/10/04/30/237238/Steve-Jobs-Hints-At-Theora-Lawsuit

Xiph.Org Foundation Responds To Steve Jobsâ Threat: âCreative Individuals Donât Really Like to Give Their Business to Jackbooted Thugsâ

,----[ Quote ]
| Here is Montgomeryâs response:
| 
|     Thomson Multimedia made their first 
|     veiled patent threats against Vorbis 
|     almost ten years ago. MPEG-LA has been 
|     rumbling for the past few years. Maybe 
|     this time it will actually come to 
|     something, but it hasnât yet. Iâll get 
|     worried when the lawyers advise me to; 
|     i.e., not yet.
| 
|     The MPEG-LA has insinuated for some time 
|     that it is impossible to build any video 
|     codec without infringing on at least 
|     some of their patents. That is, they 
|     assert they have a monopoly on all 
|     digital video compression technology, 
|     period, and it is illegal to even 
|     attempt to compete with them. Of course, 
|     theyâve been careful not to say quite 
|     exactly that.
| 
|     If Jobsâs email is genuine, this is a 
|     powerful public gaffe (âAll video codecs 
|     are covered by patents.â) Heâd be 
|     confirming MPEGâs assertion in plain 
|     language anyone can understand. It would 
|     only strengthen the pushback against 
|     software patents and add to Appleâs 
|     increasing PR mess. Macbooks and iPads 
|     may be pretty sweet, but creative 
|     individuals donât really like to give 
|     their business to jackbooted thugs.
`----

http://techie-buzz.com/tech-news/xiph-org-foundation-responds-steve-jobs-threat.html

Pot, meet kettle: a response to Steve Jobs' letter on Flash

,----[ Quote ]
| Part of the reason why Flash and iPhone OS 
| are proprietary is that Adobe and Apple 
| agreed to the terms of the H.264 patent 
| license. H.264, despite Jobs's claim, is not 
| a free standardâpatents necessary to 
| implement it are held by a group that 
| requires all users to agree to a license 
| with restrictive terms. Those terms have 
| previously even been unavailable for 
| examination online. We are publishing them 
| on fsf.org today in order to comment on 
| their unethical restrictions. The fact that 
| H.264 is a commonly used standard does not 
| make it a free standardâthe terms of its use 
| are what matter, and they require all 
| licensed software to include the following 
| notice:
| 
|     THIS PRODUCT IS LICENSED UNDER THE AVC 
|     PATENT PORTFOLIO LICENSE FOR THE 
|     PERSONAL AND NON-COMMERCIAL USE OF A 
|     CONSUMER TO (I) ENCODE VIDEO IN 
|     COMPLIANCE WITH THE AVC STANDARD ("AVC 
|     VIDEO") AND/OR (II) DECODE AVC VIDEO 
|     THAT WAS ENCODED BY A CONSUMER ENGAGED 
|     IN A PERSONAL AND NON-COMMERCIAL 
|     ACTIVITY AND/OR WAS OBTAINED FROM A 
|     VIDEO PROVIDER LICENSED TO PROVIDE AVC 
|     VIDEO. NO LICENSE IS GRANTED OR SHALL BE 
|     IMPLIED FOR ANY OTHER USE. ADDITIONAL 
|     INFORMATION MAY BE OBTAINED FROM MPEG 
|     LA, L.L.C.  SEE HTTP://WWW.MPEGLA.COM
| 
| You'll find similar language in the license 
| agreements of Final Cut Studio, Google 
| Chrome, Mac OS X, and Windows 7.
`----

http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2010/04/pot-meet-kettle-a-response-to-steve-jobs-letter-on-flash.ars

Patent challenge looming for open-source codecs?

,----[ Quote ]
| If authentic, a new e-mail from Steve Jobs 
| indicates that Apple and Microsoft--of all 
| bedfellows--could be preparing to challenge 
| the validity of open-source video codecs.
| 
| Jobs' e-mail to Hugo Roy of the Free 
| Software Foundation Europe, coupled with a 
| similarly worded announcement from Microsoft 
| on Friday, is a shot across the bow of 
| backers of the open-source Ogg Theora video 
| codec, used by Mozilla to bring HTML5 video 
| technology to Firefox. Both Apple and 
| Microsoft plan to use the h.264 codec in 
| their HTML5 strategy, which is governed by a 
| licensing body called MPEG LA. Apple and 
| Microsoft, along with a host of tech 
| companies, are also members of that group.
`----

http://news.cnet.com/8301-30684_3-20003895-265.html

Steve Jobs: mystery patent pool to attack Ogg Theora

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/04/30/steve_jobs_claims_ogg_theora_attack/

Patent Pool to Thwart Open Source Codecs

http://www.daniweb.com/news/story280205.html

Apple May Be Gunning for Open Source Codecs

http://newteevee.com/2010/04/30/apple-may-be-gunning-for-open-source-codecs/

Meet the Hypocrites: Steve Jobs 

,----[ Quote ]
| That led to the following paragraph:
| 
|     Adobeâs Flash products are 100% 
|     proprietary. They are only available 
|     from Adobe, and Adobe has sole authority 
|     as to their future enhancement, pricing, 
|     etc. While Adobeâs Flash products are 
|     widely available, this does not mean 
|     they are open, since they are controlled 
|     entirely by Adobe and available only 
|     from Adobe. By almost any definition, 
|     Flash is a closed system.
| 
| Notice anything curious about that 
| paragraph? It's a perfect description of 
| Apple's own business practices! Just replace 
| "Adobe" and "Flash" with "Apple" and 
| "iPhone", "iPad", "iPod/iTunes", or "Mac" 
| and you get a nicely worded four sentence 
| critique of Jobs' own company. Seriously... 
| How can Jobs talk about openness when his 
| notoriously secretive company is not only 
| hypocritically on the warpath against Adobe, 
| but recently goaded police into initiating a 
| criminal investigation over the 
| disappearance of Apple's fourth generation 
| iPhone prototype, which was lost by one of 
| Jobs' own employees!?
`----

http://www.nwprogressive.org/weblog/2010/04/meet-hypocrites-steve-jobs.html

Steve Jobs on Flash (or the lack thereof) and more talk about tablets

http://opensource.com/life/10/4/steve-jobs-flash-or-lack-thereof-and-more-talk-about-tablets

Apple: Apple Raises E-book Prices For Everyone

http://apple.slashdot.org/story/10/04/30/2251220/Apple-Raises-E-book-Prices-For-Everyone

What. What an utterly disgusting cult of snobs.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkvcubUACgkQU4xAY3RXLo4EOACfXQpNe1Ry7JrX4pxEBKdrSWD1
0FYAnia15IRYIA3u2aNkRBh+m3Epf+gy
=M9Jx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index