Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] [Rival] Microsoft is a Liar (Again): Lies About Security by Hiding Flaws

  • Subject: [News] [Rival] Microsoft is a Liar (Again): Lies About Security by Hiding Flaws
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 07 May 2010 18:31:59 +0100
  • Followup-to: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • User-agent: KNode/4.4.2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Security Firm Reveals Microsoft's "Silent" Patches

,----[ Quote ]
| "Microsoft silently patched three 
| vulnerabilities last month, two of them 
| affecting enterprise mission-critical 
| Exchange mail servers, without calling out 
| the bugs in the accompanying advisories, a 
| security expert said on Thursday. Two of the 
| three unannounced vulnerabilities, and the 
| most serious of the trio, were packaged with 
| MS10-024, an update to Exchange and Windows 
| SMTP Service that Microsoft issued April 13 
| and tagged as 'important,' its second-
| highest threat ranking. Ivan Arce, CTO of 
| Core Security Technologies, said Microsoft 
| patched the bugs, but failed to disclose 
| that it had done so â which could pose a 
| problem. 'They're more important than the 
| [two vulnerabilities] that Microsoft did 
| disclose,' said Arce. 'That means [system] 
| administrators may end up making the wrong 
| decisions about applying the update. They 
| need that information to assess the risk.'"
`----

http://tech.slashdot.org/story/10/05/06/1734250/Security-Firm-Reveals-Microsofts-Silent-Patches

Security firm reveals Microsoft's 'silent' patches

,----[ Quote ]
| Microsoft silently patched three 
| vulnerabilities last month, two of them 
| affecting enterprise mission-critical 
| Exchange mail servers, without calling out 
| the bugs in the accompanying advisories, a 
| security expert said today.
| 
| Two of the three unannounced 
| vulnerabilities, and the most serious of the 
| trio, were packaged with MS10-024, an update 
| to Exchange and Windows SMTP Service that 
| Microsoft issued April 13 and tagged as 
| "important," its second-highest threat 
| ranking.
| 
| According to Ivan Arce, the chief technology 
| officer of Core Security Technologies, 
| Microsoft patched the bugs, but failed to 
| disclose that it had done so.
`----

http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9176373/Security_firm_reveals_Microsoft_s_silent_patches

Microsoft update secretly fixed two 'severe' bugs

,----[ Quote ]
| A recent security patch from Microsoft 
| silently fixed two severe bugs that were 
| never disclosed even though they posed a 
| risk to many of its customers, a security 
| researcher said.
| 
| MS10-024 fixed two flaws that made it 
| possible for adversaries to intercept 
| victims' email messages sent by Exchange and 
| Windows SMTP service, NicolÃs Economou, a 
| researcher with Core Security said. But the 
| bugs - which made it "trivial" to spoof 
| responses to domain name system queries - 
| weren't disclosed and were never assigned a 
| Common Vulnerabilities and Exposure 
| identifier, sparking criticism that the 
| critical bugs weren't properly disclosed.
`----

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/05/05/secret_microsoft_patch/

Not the first time (see below). Microsoft is lies, lies, lies.


Related:

Critical Vulnerability in Microsoft Metrics

,----[ Quote ]
| This is a small subset of all the vulnerabilities, because the 
| vulnerabilities that are found through the QA process and the vulnerabilities 
| that are found by the security folks they engage as contractors to perform 
| penetration testing are fixed in service packs and major updates. For 
| Microsoft this makes sense because these fixes get the benefit of a full test 
| pass which is much more robust for a service pack or major release than it is 
| for a security update.      
`----

http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2007/11/30/critical-vulnerability-in-microsoft-metrics/


Skeletons in Microsoftâs Patch Day closet

,----[ Quote ]
| This is the first time Iâve seen Microsoft prominently admit to silently 
| fixing vulnerabilities in its bulletins â a controversial practice that 
| effectively reduces the number of publicly documented bug fixes (for those 
| keeping count) and affects patch management/deployment decisions.   
`----

http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=316


Beware of undisclosed Microsoft patches

,----[ Quote ]
| Forget for a moment whether Microsoft is throwing off patch counts 
| that Microsoft brass use to compare its security record with those 
| of its competitors. What do you think of Redmondâs silent patching 
| practice?
`----

http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=527


Microsoft is Counting Bugs Again

,----[ Quote ]
| Sorry, but Microsoft's self-evaluating security counting isn't really a 
| good accounting.
| 
| [...]
| 
| The point: Don't count on security flaw counting. The real flaw is 
| the counting.
`----

http://www.microsoft-watch.com/content/security/microsoft_is_counting_bugs_again.html?kc=MWRSS02129TX1K0000535
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkvkTo8ACgkQU4xAY3RXLo7RJACaAlFFdhMtpaxdXsuLbl6sx8WT
tCMAoLDzo+QTUi51Yb5O9d8jPxmRkyjE
=ozMA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index