Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] Why Kicking MPEG-LA to the Curb is Important and Where Google Comes in

  • Subject: [News] Why Kicking MPEG-LA to the Curb is Important and Where Google Comes in
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 06:25:54 +0100
  • Followup-to: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • User-agent: KNode/4.4.2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

10 questions for MPEG LA on H.264

,----[ Quote ]
| MPEG LA: Yes, since the Web site is 
| receiving remuneration for the AVC video 
| content it makes available on a 
| subscription basis, it would benefit from 
| the coverage our AVC License provides. The 
| amount of royalties owed, if any, would 
| depend on the number of Subscribers to 
| that website during a calendar year:
| 
| 100,000 or fewer subscribers/year = no 
| royalty;
| 100,001 - 250,000 subscribers/year = 
| $25,000;
| 250,001 - 500,000 subscribers/year = 
| $50,000;
| 500,001 - 1,000,000 subscribers/year = 
| $75,000;
| and more than 1,000,000 subscribers/year = 
| $100,000.
`----

http://www.betanews.com/article/10-questions-for-MPEG-LA-on-H264/1274306999

Adobe Releases HTML5 Pack and Announces Flash will include VP8 codec

http://thenextweb.com/apps/2010/05/19/adobe-supporting-the-html-5-movement-releases-html5-pack-and-announced-flash-will-include-vp8-codec/

Jobs drops hint on Google open video codec

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/05/20/jobs_on_vp8/

Google opens VP8 codec, aims to nuke H.264 with WebM

,----[ Quote ]
| A browser that supports WebM content isn't 
| much use if there's no WebM content to 
| play, and Google has that covered too. 
| Anyone opting into YouTube's HTML5 front-
| end will be able to use WebM for video 
| playback by appending "&webm=1" to the 
| URL.
`----

http://arstechnica.com/web/news/2010/05/google-opens-vp8-codec-aims-to-nuke-h264-with-webm.ars

Google faces off against Microsoft, Apple over Web video standard

,----[ Quote ]
| "We now have a great format for video," 
| added Hakon Wium Lie, Opera's chief 
| technology officer. "We all have video 
| cameras in our pockets. Let's use them, 
| let's back WebM."
`----

http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9177036/Google_faces_off_against_Microsoft_Apple_over_Web_video_standard

Microsoft tepid in its support for Google's WebM video plan

http://www.techflash.com/seattle/2010/05/microsoft_offers_tepid_support_for_googles_webm_video_plan.html

Microsoft Gambles on HTML5, H.264 Video for IE9

http://www.pcworld.com/article/196699/microsoft_gambles_on_html5_h264_video_for_ie9.html

Real Alternative Still a Good Way to Sidestep RealPlayer's Problems

,----[ Quote ]
| I've been using Real Alternative for 
| years. It works well and is 100% 
| transparent, that is, it doesn't bug you 
| about anything, ever. It just registers 
| itself as a DirectShow filter (Microsoft-
| speak for a codec) and with your browsers, 
| then decodes virtually any Real Media file 
| ever created. It's good enough that I 
| haven't even considered installing 
| RealPlayer in years. 
`----

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/16/AR2010051601681.html


Recent:

Canonical clarifies its H.264 licence

,----[ Quote ]
| When purchasing an OEM machine with Ubuntu
| pre-installed, there is currently no way to
| tell, without the manufacturer explicitly
| specifying them, which software and codecs
| are bundled with the machine. A device may
| be validated as Ubuntu Compatible, which
| means the OEM has tested the system and
| Canonical has verified the test, or as
| Ubuntu Certified, which means that
| Canonical have performed the testing.
| Kenyon points to the Ubuntu Certified list
| on the Canonical site, which lists systems
| from Lenovo, ASUSTek, HP, Toshiba, Samsung
| and Dell. Kenyon added "We have explored
| setting some minimum requirements for
| codecs, but this is not something that we
| presently do".
|
| So the rule of thumb is that an arbitrary
| Ubuntu system does not have a H.264 licence
| via Canonical, unless it's an OEM system
| which specifically lists the H.264 licence
| in its documentation or marketing
| materials.
`----

http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Canonical-clarifies-its-H-264-licence-993182.html


Canonical explains Ubuntu unfree video choice

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/05/05/canonical_h264_video/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkv6DeMACgkQU4xAY3RXLo61twCcCtcp2aOHrSwWRxBJMehbZ4Gx
Ks8An0VZElRchmwto5j/7V7yW0QK30SL
=fn+E
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index