Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] Many GNU/Linux Options for Servers; the Merits of Meritocracy

  • Subject: [News] Many GNU/Linux Options for Servers; the Merits of Meritocracy
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 21:29:02 +0100
  • Followup-to: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • User-agent: KNode/4.4.2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

8 More Linux Distributions for Web Server

,----[ Quote ]
| 8 More Linux Distributions for Web Server: 
| I've already shared with you a list of some 
| of the best and most well-known Linux 
| distributions used on web servers. However, 
| there are still plenty of excellent server-
| oriented Linux distros that I failed to 
| mention there. So I think it is important 
| to make a follow up post and bring you 
| another round of Linux distributions for 
| web server.
`----

http://www.junauza.com/2010/06/linux-distributions-for-web-server.html

Meritocracy, Fate Or Anarchy

,----[ Quote ]
| Many folks on a higher pay grade than mine 
| tout that open source thrives as a 
| Meritocracy. In this model, folks who are 
| interested enough create a project and 
| release the source under GPL/Whatever and 
| if the project is "good" or "gooder" than 
| other ones it has more merit and will 
| advance to become more widely used etc. One 
| interesting counter point to this made by 
| Alain de Botton in his TED talk where if 
| this rise due to merit, then things also 
| sink due to it. Alain is not talking open 
| source, but if we switch to that context, 
| then if your project is not becoming 
| successful, or you are struggling, then the 
| Meritocracy eye balls would see that since 
| you created the project, by implication you 
| are scum.
| 
| [...]
| 
| Another good example of this is the Linux 
| distributions who want a project for "Y" 
| and decide to create a solution themselves 
| rather than trying to adopt something that 
| a committed developer has been working on 
| for years. In some cases the "owning" the 
| code can be more important than reuse, and 
| most often the code is released under and 
| open source license. But this be a fairly 
| vicious demotivator for folks who were 
| writing the existing "Y" solutions.
`----

http://monkeyiq.blogspot.com/2010/06/meritocracy-fate-or-anarchy.html


Recent:

The best helmsmen stand on shore

,----[ Quote ]
| Bruce Byfield is completely unaware of this
| too. In his latest misguided rambling 'Open
| Source Projects and the Meritocracy Myth'
| he lists a number of major projects with
| paid developers. As if meritocracy is and
| should only be applied there.
|
| First, he obviously doesn't understand the
| full concept of meritocracy. Meritocracy in
| FOSS is about merits, not just "who is the
| best". If a paid developer can spend eight
| straight hours per day and provides most of
| the code he will obviously rise in the
| ranks, a fact that is clearly supported by
| the findings of the FLOSS polls, that
| infamous report that everybody likes to
| quote and nobody obviously read.
| Furthermore, in our capitalist world those
| who pay call the shots. The privilege that
| the community has is that if it doesn't
| like it, it can fork. Something that Eben
| Moglen recently confirmed.
|
| [...]
|
| Meritocracy is not the guiding principle of
| the FOSS ideology. It simply works best for
| these thousands of unpaid volunteers you're
| so eager to insult and attack on each and
| every opportunity you get. Proof? Here you
| got it. Source? FLOSS polls!
`----

http://thebeezspeaks.blogspot.com/2009/12/best-helmsmen-stand-on-shore.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkwrqQ4ACgkQU4xAY3RXLo7wOgCeKIF58rfIKy8DLOJV3L4+3R/Z
O4QAoLU09H9rSjn6GHzATIchH7whuYgE
=9mW7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index