Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] [Rival] Microsoft Spoke About SCO Before the Lawsuit Against Linux

  • Subject: [News] [Rival] Microsoft Spoke About SCO Before the Lawsuit Against Linux
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 00:03:21 +0100
  • Followup-to: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • User-agent: KNode/4.4.2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

What Did Microsoft Know About SCO's Plans and When Did It Know It?

,----[ Quote ]
| What did Microsoft know about SCO's plan to 
| attack Linux, and when did it know it? And 
| was it a force behind it? 
| 
| [...]
| 
| But now, thanks to a volunteer working on 
| doing the exhibits in the Comes v. 
| Microsoft antitrust litigation as text, we 
| find an email thread in Exhibit 8953 [PDF] 
| where Microsoft employees, including the 
| managing director of Microsoft in India at 
| the time, mention SCO in a discussion about 
| heading off the Linux threat in India. The 
| emails are dated September 11, 2002. Given 
| the date, I believe this opens up the 
| question of Microsoft's involvement once 
| again. At a minimum, it needs 
| clarification. If it doesn't demonstrate 
| Microsoft knowing about SCO's plans before 
| they unfurled, what does it mean? I'd like 
| Microsoft to tell us. Because I have a lot 
| of questions about the email thread. 
| 
| [...]
| 
| If you recall, EDGI  was about pushing 
| Microsoft in India so as to head off Linux 
| and StarOffice use there in government and 
| education. This email says Bill Gates 
| thought they should just give away their 
| software in India and wherever necessary to 
| head off the threat, and that is part of 
| what is being discussed, because some 
| disagreed about giving it away for free. 
| But EDGI was not restricted to India; it 
| could be implemented wherever needed.
| 
| I believe this exhibit may be a smoking 
| gun. At a minimum, it calls for 
| clarification, and if and when SCO v. IBM 
| starts up again, I believe it could provide 
| a basis for limited discovery on this very 
| topic or if Michael Anderer is put on the 
| stand, it opens up a fruitful thread. 
| Regulatory bodies are also completely free 
| to investigate whether it was indeed 
| Microsoft using SCO as an anti-competitive 
| weapon against Linux in violation of 
| antitrust law.
| 
| The email mentions Novell, SCO and Trishul, 
| and I thought it might be referring to an 
| inside name for the strategy, since that is 
| the name of a Trident air defense missile 
| ("The Trishul air-defense missile is 
| intended to counter a low level attack with 
| a very quick reaction time and has an all 
| weather capability."), but it is also 
| possible it's referring to a Microsoft 
| employee who heads up the Runtime Analysis 
| & Design research group, so I've written to 
| him asking him which it might be or if he 
| can clarify the email. Meanwhile, take a 
| look. The reference to Novell is more 
| puzzling, but it is certainly possible, 
| given the evidence that SCO thought Novell 
| would join them, that Microsoft back then 
| thought so too.
`----

http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20100627122353935


Recent:

SCO's Bankruptcy Hearing Monday Is Called Off

,----[ Quote ]
| SCO's bankruptcy hearing scheduled for Monday
| in Delaware has been cancelled. The next one
| will be on July 12 at 1:30, or so they say, so
| if you were planning to attend on Monday,
| please rearrange your plans.
`----

http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20100618110800640
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkwrzTkACgkQU4xAY3RXLo55igCfb2q5P1oWKr8ZR2ir38t4kJFg
p7kAoJ6V9XPyAbbYgGIYfxjSawPfvkOB
=aehN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index