Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] More Interpretation of Impact of In Re Bilski on Other Areas

  • Subject: [News] More Interpretation of Impact of In Re Bilski on Other Areas
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 20:21:49 +0100
  • Followup-to: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • User-agent: KNode/4.4.2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Reading The Bilski Tea Leaves For What The Supreme Court Thinks Of Software Patents

,----[ Quote ]
| Since it's been a week or so since the 
| Bilski ruling, and as more people have had 
| more time to look at and sift through the 
| rulings in greater detail, some are 
| realizing there may actually be a light at 
| the end of the tunnel for those who dislike 
| software patents. Contrary to the claims of 
| the IEEE, the ruling did not, in fact, come 
| out and say that software patents are legit.
`----

http://techdirt.com/article.php?sid=20100701/16343110051

BIO Commends Supreme Court for Expansive View of Patentability in Bilski Decision

http://news.thomasnet.com/companystory/BIO-Commends-Supreme-Court-on-expansive-view-of-patentability-579527

Supreme Court Tasks Lower Court with Determining Criteria for Dx Patentability 

,----[ Quote ]
| A day after reaching a decision in the 
| business methods patent case Bilski v. 
| Kappos, the Supreme Court this week remanded 
| the diagnostic patent case Prometheus 
| Laboratories v. Mayo Collaborative Services 
| et al., to the Federal Circuit Court of 
| Appeals with an order to revisit the case in 
| light of Bilski. 
`----

http://www.genomeweb.com/dxpgx/supreme-court-tasks-lower-court-determining-criteria-dx-patentability?page=show

Bilski Brouhaha: Supreme Court Keeps Stevens at Bay

http://www.ecommercetimes.com/story/Bilski-Brouhaha-Supreme-Court-Keeps-Stevens-at-Bay-70327.html?wlc=1278359841&wlc=1278375916

Justice Scaliaâs Indecision a Victory for the Patent Bar

http://timothyblee.com/2010/06/29/justice-scalias-indecision-a-victory-for-the-patent-bar/

Bummed Out About Bilski

http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2010/07/bummed-out-about-bilski.html

Court Patent Ruling Leaves Software Patents Intact

http://www.pcworld.com/article/199994/court_patent_ruling_leaves_software_patents_intact.html

IEEE Celebrates Bilski Ruling With Misleading Press Release

http://techdirt.com/articles/20100630/18433810032.shtml

They didn't say that:

Yes, software can be patented, US Supremes say

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/06/28/us_supremes_software_patent/

Tech Comics: "The Joy of Patents"

http://itmanagement.earthweb.com/cnews/article.php/3891071/Tech-Comics-The-Joy-of-Patents.htm


Recent:

 Supreme Court Patent Ruling Avoids Tough Issues

,----[ Quote ]
| Upholding an appeals court ruling in the
| closely watched Bilski v. Kappos case, the
| U.S. Supreme Court denied patent protection
| to a specific business method for energy
| trading. But the Supreme Court chose not to
| clarify the lines that define patentable
| subject matter.
|
| The disallowed patent claim describes a
| series of steps for hedging against the risk
| of price changes in the energy commodities
| market. It was rejected by a patent examiner
| because it was an abstract formula not
| implemented on a specific device.
`----

http://www.informationweek.com/news/windows/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=225701651


Supreme Court ruling dashes hopes that software patents will go away

http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/62993


Supreme Court 'Bilski' ruling doesn't rule out software, business-method patents

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/fasterforward/2010/06/supreme_court_bilski_ruling_ke.html


Supreme Court Delivers Open Source Smackdown

http://www.daniweb.com/news/story293269.html


Todayâs opinion in Bilski

http://www.scotusblog.com/2010/06/today%E2%80%99s-opinion-in-bilski/


Justices Take Broad View of Business Method Patents

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/29/business/29patent.html?_r=1&src=busln


Supreme Court relaxes limits on innovations that can be patented

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/28/AR2010062803523.html


Reflections on Bilski

,----[ Quote ]
| The only way this issue can be settled
| promptly now is by legislation. M$ and its
| buddies will be lobbying fiercely to have
| the patent laws explicitly accept
| software. Unfortunately for them, all
| software, except perhaps in a controller
| where the software cannot possibly have
| multiple uses, is abstract. That is to
| say, programmes written in a high-level
| language do not even deal with bits let
| alone reality. They deal in variables and
| data-structures, abstractions in
| themselves. If the legislators allow
| software patents, they will have to allow
| patents on abstractions, something they
| will not do or cannot. That would throw
| our thoughts and all freedom under the
| bus. Indeed, one brief they did not
| reference was about freedom of speech as
| software. Patents cannot be allowed to
| restrict freedom of speech.
`----

http://pogson.6k.ca/2010/06/29/reflections-on-bilski/


Bilski v. Kappos: The Supreme Court Declines to Prohibit Business Method Patents

http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/06/bilski-v-kappos-supreme-court-declines-prohibit


Bilski case: the United States starts to clean the software patents minefield

,----[ Quote ]
| The US Supreme Court has issued on Monday
| a ruling that many people had been waiting
| for in the so-called "Bilski" case1,
| regarding a patent on a business method.
| This decision, even though it does not
| exclude every software from patentability,
| invalidates a majority of them, including
| those patents on computer implemented
| intellectual methods. It is now time for
| European lawmakers to halt software
| patents' proliferation in Europe.
`----

http://www.april.org/fr/bilski-case-united-states-starts-clean-software-patents-minefield


Software patents after Bilski

,----[ Quote ]
| Bilski gave us a wonderful opportunity to
| increase awareness to the harm caused by
| software patents. More scholars, more
| developers, more journalists, more
| politicians, and more patent attorneys
| than ever before have heard from our
| community on this issue. What's next?
`----

http://www.fsf.org/blogs/software-patents-after-bilski


Justice John Paul Stevens on Bilski and Business Methods Patents, as text

,----[ Quote ]
| He's actually read and absorbed James
| Bessen's book Patent Failure and he
| comprehends the dangers and the costs that
| such patents present. Thank you, Jim
| Bessen (and co-authors Mike Meurer, Eric
| Maskin and Bob Hunt), for all your careful
| and helpful work, educating judges and
| lawyers to the dangers of software
| patents. Significantly, Stevens is joined
| by Justices Ginsburg, Breyer and
| Sotomayor. Even Justice Scalia, in a
| separate concurring opinion written by
| Justice Breyer, agreed that business
| methods should not be granted patents.
| That's five Supreme Court judges. As Tom
| Goldstein of SCOTUSblog points out in his
| analysis of the Bilski opinion, that means
| that business methods patents survived by
| a single vote. And even at that, the
| opinion stated that few such methods
| should be granted a patent.
`----

http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20100629014657710


Initial thoughts on Bilski

http://opensource.com/law/10/6/initial-thoughts-bilski


Sifting through the clues to patentability: Four take-home points from Bilskiâs mixed bag

,----[ Quote ]
| 1)   State Street Bankâs âuseful,
| concrete, and tangible resultâ test is
| dead.
|
| [...]
|
| 2)   Abstract ideas likely include âbasic
| conceptsâ and methods that can be reduced
| to a mathematical formula.
|
| [...]
|
| 3)   Parker v. Flookâs âfield of useâ and
| âpostsolution activityâ limitations are
| alive and well.
|
| [...]
|
| 4)   Expect more Section 101 challenges,
| especially at the early stages of patent
| litigation.
`----

http://cyberlawcases.com/2010/06/30/sifting-through-the-clues-to-patentability-four-take-home-points-from-bilski%E2%80%99s-mixed-bag/


Search for Bilski scapegoats targets IBM

,----[ Quote ]
| Given the failure of the Bilski case to
| change the status quo regarding software
| and business method patents, the search is
| on for scapegoats, for weak sisters in the
| anti-patent fight who can be made open to
| criticism.
|
| It is similar to what happens after a
| losing political campaign. Those most
| committed to the cause argue that itâs
| weak supporters, those willing to do
| business under the given circumstances,
| who are responsible for their political
| failure.
|
| So it is that Florian Mueller of
| Fosspatents has seized upon IBM.
`----

http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/search-for-bilski-scapegoats-targets-ibm/6776


Supreme Court Ruling Keeps Door Open for Software Patents

http://www.itworld.com/open-source/112302/supreme-court-ruling-keeps-door-open-software-patents
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkwzgk0ACgkQU4xAY3RXLo7AtACdFoaMogkxjt6h7Ii5eCmf4Nit
C5EAmgN/go5PWOeXLoPkz5Zs8HVjFeEt
=Xq6u
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index