-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
____/ Kari Laine on Thursday 18 Aug 2011 16:27 : \____
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message
>
> On 08/18/2011 06:17 PM, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>> ____/ Kari Laine on Saturday 13 Aug 2011 18:51 : \____
>>
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>> NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message
>>
>>> On 08/13/2011 06:05 PM, Snit wrote:
>>>> Kari Laine stated in post 95mdnS1z_MG__NvTnZ2dnUVZ8jSdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx on
>>>> 8/13/11 4:33 AM:
>>>>
>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>> NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message
>>>>>
>>>>> On 08/13/2011 02:51 AM, Snit wrote:
>>>>>> Chris Ahlstrom stated in post j247i5$klk$3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on 8/12/11 2:52
>>>>>> PM:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> TomB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2011-08-12, the following emerged from the brain of Hadron:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Tell me, do YOU agree that MS are responsible for the Spanair
>>>>>>>>> deaths` Roy Schestowitz claimed they are. He was ripped a new one by
>>>>>>>>> respected journalist Jack Schofield. Did YOU correct Roy?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No? What a surprise.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have had Roy killfiled for a very long time, so I have no idea what
>>>>>>>> you're talking about.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Notice how "Hadron", as usual, completely ignores evidence posted by
>>>>>>> others (Homer in this case) that show Roy was pretty much correct about
>>>>>>> Windows (not MS, that's the usual "Hadronic" conflation at work) being
>>>>>>> at fault.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On one hand, blame Windows or MS. On the other, admit it was malware.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And round and round they go.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Microsoft's sloppy hole ridden system made it possible the worm to
>>>>> enter. If the system would have been Linux then probably the problems
>>>>> would have been avoided. What so difficult to understand in that?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Android shows that Linux based OSs can get malware, too.
>>>>
>>
>>> Android is not Linux it is a fork.
>>> If user installs program containing malware then all bet's are off. No
>>> operating system is safe in that.
>>> If one uses Linux distribution and only installs software from the
>>> distributions software repositories then one does not get malware.
>>
>>> Linux and I bet Android too does not have network vulnerabilities often
>>> where machine can be rooted remotely without any kind of local access.
>>> Windows is proud leader in this category.
>>
>> Android is not a fork actually.
>>
>
> Why I have read somewhere that Linux proper and Android kernel are not
> in match. And there was some talks between these people Old news?
>
> It would be nice if official Linux kernel and Android kernel were in sync.
>
> Still have not had time to have a look on Android development but can
> one develop an application to Android using glibc and X?
It's then that you compare _GNU_/Linux to Android.
- --
~~ Best of wishes
Dr. Roy S. Schestowitz (Ph.D. Medical Biophysics), Imaging Researcher
http://Schestowitz.com | GNU/Linux administration | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Editor @ http://techrights.org & Broadcaster @ http://bytesmedia.co.uk/
GPL-licensed 3-D Othello @ http://othellomaster.com
Non-profit search engine proposal @ http://iuron.com
Contact E-mail address (direct): s at schestowitz dot com
Contact Internet phone (SIP): schestowitz@xxxxxxxxx (24/7)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAk5PgjsACgkQU4xAY3RXLo5aFwCgjNZqIzdBzvQRZ4I/f1hPAvrB
b8IAoKfYOYm/M0zWs+Hl9T2uPgJ/9sjm
=4aYk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
