-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
____/ Ender2070 on Tuesday 11 Oct 2011 13:52 : \____
> I'm curious to find out
>
> 1) Why is the TechBytes audiocast (renamed podcast because of Apple) licensed
> under the creative commons? or another similar license? It's fully protected
> by copyright law....
>
> 2) Why is creative commons music being relicensed under restrictive copyright
> without the same rights granted by the original author? Was permission
> obtained to do this?
>
> It would seem hypocritical of Techrights to do this. Especially when they
> vehemently attack others who do this under the guise that they work for
> Microsoft or other such nonsense.
We're not against copyrights. In fact, the FSF is not against copyrights, either.
It even endorsed creative commons a couple of years back. Do your homework, use
facts please. Clue: the GPL is _based upon_ copyright law.
- --
~~ Best of wishes
Dr. Roy S. Schestowitz (Ph.D. Medical Biophysics), Imaging Researcher
http://Schestowitz.com | GNU/Linux administration | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Editor @ http://techrights.org & Broadcaster @ http://bytesmedia.co.uk/
Managing partner @ http://scifitness.co.uk & http://iuron.com
GPL-licensed 3-D Othello @ http://othellomaster.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAk6UaHUACgkQU4xAY3RXLo4N3QCfVGLZU/deJ90Tzf6iSwvVtPMJ
DaEAnisKaApcUhLSlobivK5vC8bEZE8P
=A5Tx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
