-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
____/ bbgruff on Friday 21 Oct 2011 17:03 : \____
> For a while now, our good friend Snit has been arguing that "The success of
> Android proves that advocates are wrong, and that Microsoft has *not* been
> responsible for keeping Linux off the desktop".
>
> My own feeling on that is the exact opposite - that Android has been selling
> on devices where Microsoft has little or no control over the OEMs, and with
> spectacular results, hence proving that Microsoft has and does affect by
> political means Linux uptake on the desktop.
>
> I won't try to summarize the following article - it's long-ish, but *well*
> worth reading!
I helped research for this article :-)
- --
~~ Best of wishes
Dr. Roy S. Schestowitz (Ph.D. Medical Biophysics), Imaging Researcher
http://Schestowitz.com | GNU/Linux administration | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Editor @ http://techrights.org & Broadcaster @ http://bytesmedia.co.uk/
Managing partner @ http://scifitness.co.uk & http://iuron.com
GPL-licensed 3-D Othello @ http://othellomaster.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAk6iFc8ACgkQU4xAY3RXLo7lnQCZAeYRqo7CSZnv6ARjEhYUuKgO
5ekAnAxtDLns94WcqGhpxSGTAMDa2U3S
=dAMq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
