British Police and COVID-19 Inquiry Amid Excess Deaths
r. John Campbell isn’t make this up. Watch this. New and damning evidence, published today:
r. John Campbell isn’t make this up. Watch this. New and damning evidence, published today:
N today’s channel of Dr. John Campbell there’s a new video that speaks of “Excess deaths, MPs request data” (in relation to the COVID-19 vaccines, too).
And here is the description in case Google censors him again.
Health Secretary urged to release data that ‘may link Covid vaccine to excess deaths’
MPs and peers criticise ‘wall of silence’Tweet from Andrew Bridgen with the letter in full
Health Secretary urged to release data that ‘may link Covid vaccine to excess deaths’
MPs and peers criticise ‘wall of silence’www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/03/02/health-secreta…
MPs and peers have accused the Health Secretary of withholding data that could link the Covid vaccine to excess deaths
A cross-party group
“growing public and professional concerns” UK’s rates of excess deaths since 2020
Demand to be shown the underlying data for to support the Government’s assertion, “no evidence” linking excess deaths to the vaccines for Covid-19.
21 MPs and peers
“If those data do indeed exist, please share them; if thorough investigations have already ruled out such a link, please share the relevant reports,”
“There is no place here for blind faith.”
Written to
Health Secretary
Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC)
Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA)
UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA)
Potentially critical data, which maps the date of people’s Covid vaccine doses to the date of their deaths,
have been released to pharmaceutical companies but not put into the public domain.
Data should be released “on the same anonymised basis that it was shared with the pharmaceutical groups, and there seems to be no credible reason why that should not be done immediately”.
“Questions about these trends, however, have to date been met by a relative wall of silence from your organisations and other public health officials.”
A DHSC spokesman
“We are committed to data transparency and publish a wide range of data on excess mortality. The datasets published are kept under constant review.”
“Time for serious action and answers,” Dr. John Campbell says:
AM hardly surprised that state and corporate media isn’t all over this thing; it has been too busy talking about Pfizer’s share price rather than medical issues.
If we don’t get answers, vaccine hesitancy will (in general) increase and cause a lot of trouble for society for decades to come, burdening health systems.
Companies that made vaccines for COVID-19 did not deny the blood clotting issues, nor did governments, which pulled some of these off the market. This was even in the media, hence no need to speculate about that. It’s also in official Web sites of respectable, rich countries’ governments. No “anti-vaxx” here…
As a side note: New figures from ONS came out less than a day ago. In week 3 of 2024 we have had more than 1,000 (higher number than a thousand) deaths than in week 3 of 2019, i.e. 5 years ago and before COVID-19. That’s more than a thousand additional dead people in just one week in England and Wales. Add up 52 weeks and you’re looking at a large football stadium at full capacity… just for excess deaths.
We need answers. Governments try to conceal answers because they may complicit and thus be held accountable here.
There is a General Election coming up here, so the last thing Tories want right now is a proper investigation rather than “he says, she says” about some “Boris party”.
‘ve just published this article about a rigged system designed to enrich predators who borrow and then stash money.
Schismogenesis in Bill Gated-funded sites (those machines run Windows with back doors):
NEED to clarify upfront I do not believe the 2020 election in the United States was “stolen” and I do not support Donald Trump. He disgusts me.
The United States is still “using fraudulent voting machines” with back doors, a friend has reminded me. But the media giants aren’t talking about and “associating opposition to fraudulent voting technologies/products with crazies. Other crazies will defend fraudulent voting technologies/products for no other reason than those two crazies are opposed to them…”
Techrights did at least 2 “statements” on this issue [1, 2] just to clarify voting machines are no good regardless of news sites’ rhetoric.
Quit using opaque electronic voting machines and then lessen the likilohood of armed fanatics storming government buildings in an act of overt insurrection.
Retrieval statistics: 21 queries taking a total of 0.150 seconds • Please report low bandwidth using the feedback form
Original styles created by Ian Main (all acknowledgements) • PHP scripts and styles later modified by Roy Schestowitz • Help yourself to a GPL'd copy
|— Proudly powered by W o r d P r e s s — based on a heavily-hacked version 1.2.1 (Mingus) installation —|