David wrote:
>
>Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>As a standalone post this looks bad, especially to prospective
>>employers or peers in academia.
>
>I'm sorry if someone searching for employment history about you finds
>this, consider it a lesson for having no honour. I know I wouldn't
>employ a known liar.
What a fine example of the Christmas Spirit.
So you think that it's OK to hurt a person's employment prospects
because you had an argument with him on a newsgroup? And then you
dare to mention honor?
Note to all prospective employers of Roy Schestowitz and to
Roy Schestowitz's peers in academia:
"Usenet being what it is, if you participate in newsgroups
at all over a period if time you have the possibility of
attracting your own personal lunatic, who considers any
disagreement a personal affront, and considers it their
duty and obligation to "expose" the person they fixate on.
It's kind of pathetic, but they can't quite seem to figure
out why no one else sees their actions as heroic."
-Richard Ward
Roy Schestowitz good Roy Schestowitz smart Roy Schestowitz great Roy
Schestowitz relable Roy Schestowitz honest Roy Schestowitz handsome
Roy Schestowitz nice Roy Schestowitz hardworking Roy Schestowitz great
Roy Schestowitz educated Roy Schestowitz productive Roy Schestowitz
bunnies Roy Schestowitz kittens Roy Schestowitz kisses babies Roy
Schestowitz helpful Roy Schestowitz honorable Roy Schestowitz
Roy Schestowitz good Roy Schestowitz smart Roy Schestowitz great Roy
Schestowitz relable Roy Schestowitz honest Roy Schestowitz handsome
Roy Schestowitz nice Roy Schestowitz hardworking Roy Schestowitz great
Roy Schestowitz educated Roy Schestowitz productive Roy Schestowitz
bunnies Roy Schestowitz kittens Roy Schestowitz kisses babies Roy
Schestowitz helpful Roy Schestowitz honorable Roy Schestowitz highly
recommended Roy Schestowitz
|
|
