<alt.www.webmaster , Roy Schestowitz , newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<df9giv$2qhd$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<Fri, 02 Sep 2005 13:28:36 +0100>
> > IIRC, the original description of this group was something along the
> > lines of "to discuss the various issues that affect Webmasters" which is
> > particularly vague. IMHO it is fair to say that anything goes as long as
> > it's marked OT.
>
> I found that OT threads tend to involve a small group of regular particpants
> while the real questions, which are are on-topic, get triggerred by
> hit-and-run posters. This characterises many groups, but no all.
>
If a newsgroup cant handle the odd OT thread then it cant be much of a
newsgroup .
As the number of on topic threads vastly outnumbers the amount of OT
threads then there isnt really anything to improve as there isnt really
a problem .
--
www.vhit.co.uk
www.phpguestbook.co.uk
|
|
