On Thu, 08 Jun 2006 18:56:11 +0000, Edwards wrote:
>
> I don't know. I do know that there are certain things one has to do
> before one is _criminally_ infringing copyright, and that neither you
> nor Erik nor flatfish have produced any evidence even _implying_ any
> of those things have taken place in the case at hand.
>
> Is there some number of fraudulent accusations you have to make before
> someone gets pissed off enough to sue you for libel?
Look, I'm not saying Roy is a criminal however I am saying he is wrong.
And why are the images still on the site if he has not received permission
from the author to put them there?
It's just ethically wrong.
--
flatfish+++
"Why do they call it a flatfish?"
|
|
