Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Book-Sized Linux Computer for Just $149

  • Subject: Re: Book-Sized Linux Computer for Just $149
  • From: "Larry Qualig" <lqualig@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: 6 May 2006 19:40:20 -0700
  • Complaints-to: groups-abuse@google.com
  • In-reply-to: <sljvi3-bbr.ln1@dragon.myth>
  • Injection-info: j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=12.170.48.219; posting-account=I0FyeA0AAABAUAjJ9vi7laKRssUBoQA3
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: http://groups.google.com
  • References: <3747318.9kg4bgjWAb@schestowitz.com> <vrpvthxojme7.dlg@funkenbusch.com> <sljvi3-bbr.ln1@dragon.myth>
  • User-agent: G2/0.2
  • Xref: news.mcc.ac.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:1107102
Jim Richardson wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sat, 6 May 2006 14:13:27 -0500,
>  Erik Funkenbusch <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Sat, 06 May 2006 06:55:04 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> >
> >> http://kurobox.com/revolution/what.html
> >
> > Nice.  Might be useful for file and print serving, and simple HTTP.  But
> > you're not going to want to run a heavy site with dynamic content and
> > database activity.  266Mhz with 128MB of memory is a bit weak for that.
> >
>
> well duh!
>
>
> > It would be interesting to see them make a "blade" type server out of this,
> > with 10 or 20 of these on a single 1U device.  It would be good for a web
> > hosting environment with a shared SQL server running on beefy hardware.
>
> You wouldn't fit 20 of them in a 1U enclosure, also, the
> heat output would fry them, you'd need to pipe in liquid cooling. As it
> is, the box has an external "brick" supply, and you have to take that
> into account in a rack setup.
>
> Make a great workstation for most general usage, as well as a light
> server as you mention. But forget the heavy lifting. There are better,
> cheaper ways to do that.

If you're trying to make the absolute cheapest computer possible then
one would use a 266Mhz processor. But if you're willing to pay just a
couple of extra dollars you can get a "real" CPU. Checking my CPU price
web-site I see the following:

=$881	 - 	xeon 3.8ghz 800
=$545	 - 	xeon 3.6ghz 604
=$640	 - 	xeon 3.6ghz 2mb 800
=$358	 - 	xeon 3.4ghz 604
=$475	 - 	xeon 3.4ghz 2mb 800
=$250	 - 	xeon 3.2ghz 800
=$390	 - 	xeon 3.2ghz 533
=$319	 - 	xeon 3.2ghz 2mb 800
=$201	 - 	xeon 3.0ghz 800
=$375	 - 	xeon 3.0ghz 533
=$158	 - 	xeon 2.8ghz 800
=$245	 - 	xeon 2.8ghz 533
=$185	 - 	xeon 2.6ghz
=$165	 - 	xeon 2.66ghz 533
=$138	 - 	xeon 2.4ghz 533
=$65	 - 	xeon 2.0ghz 533
=$30	 - 	xeon 1.7ghz
=$39	 - 	xeon 1.5ghz


For $39 you can get a 1.5Ghz xeon. (AMD processors are even less
expensive). It would take more than 5 blades to get the CPU performance
of asingle xeon 1.5Ghz machine. My guess is that 5 blades would cost
more than $39.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index