-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:15:59 -0400,
amicus_curious <acdc@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
><spike1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:t1goc4-h7j.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> amicus_curious <ACDC@xxxxxxx> did eloquently scribble:
>>
>>> "Roy Schestowitz" <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:1364703.MsSrEIbMCN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> SCO's big campaign that wasn't
>>>>
>>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>
>>> SCO's imminent demise is foretold over and again with glee by the
>>> advocates
>>> here, presumably because SCO is thought to be some instance of a
>>> Microsoft
>>> class derivative. However, the beat seems to continue on and on, like
>>> the
>>> Eveready Bunny.
>>
>> Oh, it's nowt to do with the microsoft connection.
>> We loath sco due to the sheer treachery of the bastards.
>> They made all their money as a linux distribution and then once they amass
>> enough to buy a unix, they shit in their own nest.
>>
>> They deserve nothing but contempt from all concerned.
>> --
> If my memory serves me well, I remember that SCO nee Caldera made all their
> money from suing Microsoft over the DR-DOS situation concurrent with the
> DOJ/states vs Microsoft case. I don't think they made 10 cents from their
I don't think so, I think that was the "old" SCO, which became
Tarantella group or somesuch, after the "new" SCO bought them out.
> Linux sales. I don't disagree that they are contemptible folk seeking a
> quick hit on legal system technicalities, but even so, their case continues
> in spite of the sage declarations of the posters here.
>
it continues, down, and down. The company's doomed. It's funny to watch.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFF+f5wd90bcYOAWPYRAsU1AJ9ixkIEHbBYuwe3m7a4jcBWQJT2qgCglaBp
aD1JC/SB/GlHVc7rzc7Curs=
=Kl2M
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Jim Richardson http://www.eskimo.com/~warlock
You sound reasonable... Oops, time to up my medication
|
|
