Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: COLA Stats: Saturday the 10th of March, 2007.

  • Subject: Re: COLA Stats: Saturday the 10th of March, 2007.
  • From: Hadron Quark <hadronquark@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 23:25:33 +0100
  • Cancel-lock: sha1:CQDHxp/Nq9WR4gy/pE0RH/EDNzA=
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • References: <407ac4-d1l.ln1@sky.matrix> <reply_in_group-DAF5DC.02193610032007@news.supernews.com> <ti9bc4-m1f.ln1@dog.did.it> <ta7ec4-aa4.ln1@ellandroad.demon.co.uk> <uj8ec4-aa4.ln1@ellandroad.demon.co.uk> <3582133.D7igAKG6jI@schestowitz.com>
  • User-agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)
  • Xref: ellandroad.demon.co.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:503718
Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> __/ [ Mark Kent ] on Sunday 11 March 2007 21:23 \__
>
>> Mark Kent <mark.kent@xxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>> Roy Culley <mrloy@xxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>> 
>>>>>>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> Toplist of Troll Feeders [2]
>>>>> ...
>>>>>>   30. Mark Kent <mark.kent@xxxxxxxxxxx>                             1  
>>>>>>   0
>>>>> 
>>>>> ...Mark is at the bottom of the troll feeding list, with 1 message?
>>>>> And gee, Mark was involved in the stats program.  What a
>>>>> coincidence.
>>>> 
>>>> Mark contributed ideas for my cola stats script timmy. The problem
>>>> with the thread you mention is that [H]omer didn't update the
>>>> troll list.
>>>> 
>>>> [H]omer just do this (if you want of course):
>>>> 
>>>> echo "lintard:::lintard - WINTROLL" >> colastats.data
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Of course, he should have done that, but I suspect this person will not
>>> be back, at least, not for some time, anyway.  My action (whether you
>>> agree or not) appeared to catalyse the aioe folk into removing cola
>>> posting access.  Probably not permanently, but nevertheless, it was a
>>> good move on their part.
>>> 
>> 
>> Actually, I've recalled that Homer had taken a decision to exclude
>> lintard from the stats altogether on the basis of attention seeking.
>> There is precedent for this in any case, so I have no particular problem
>> with that.  Perhaps the script needs some adjustment to take account of
>> that, though, as I've no desire to take any credit for troll-feeding,
>> either.
>
> Flatfish seems to be back and he's crossposting to about 5 other groups to
> find an audience. I replied by accident (misclassification), but it's now
> being filtered.

"misclassification"? What *are* you going on about now?? All this talk
about trolls is OFF TOPIC. Please take your troll feeding and your SPAM
elsewhere.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index