On 11 Mar 2007 09:49:34 -0700, achmed.jones@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>On Mar 11, 11:08 am, B Gruff <bbgr...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Sunday 11 March 2007 15:32 achmed.jo...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>
>> > Nobody but the other Open Sores zealots care about your religious
>> > points.
>>
>> 1. Your stupid cross-posting noted, but since you are the same stupid troll
>> that we have come to know so well, that's not really surprising, is it?
>
>Ahh yes, the flatfish defense.
>Aren't you the one following Roy Schestowitz around like a puppy dog
>sniifing at another dogs hind quarters?
>
>You make all kinds of accusations about people and how they are all
>flatfish and so forth, but you seem
>to lack any sort of concrete evidence to substantiate these claims.
>
>> 2. The only group to which the original was addressed was
>> comp.os.linux.advocacy.
>
>Of course.
>And why do you suppose that is?
>
>I'll tell you why, so Roy's lackeys can come out of the woodwork with
>atta boy posts.
>It's safe in COLA to post anything pro Linux no matter how much of a
>lie it is however when
>these very same posts find their way into the real world, the Linux
>zealot lunacy gets exposed for what it
>it really is.
>Lunacy.
>
>
>> If only OSS zealots care about the points made, please explain to us why you
>> feel it necessary to troll that group, use several dozen different nyms
>> over the past 2 weeks even (let alone the ones before that!), and why you
>> feel the need to cross-post to all those other groups?
>
>If only you could prove that claim.
>Talk is cheap, especially when it originates from a Linux lackey.
>
>While you're at it, why not prove I'm flatfish.
>That should be good for a few laughs.
>
>Oh, BTW I noticed you haven't been able to offer a counter argument to
>my post.
>Neither have any of the other Linux cuckoos.
>
>
Oh Oh....Roy must have struck another Troll nerve. Probably with some
vaild well researched information....for a Troll that's like throwing
Holy water on a vampire.
|
|
