-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Law Professor: Counter Terrorism Czar Told Me There Is Going To Be An i-9/11
And An i-Patriot Act
,----[ Quote ]
| Amazing revelations have emerged concerning already existing government plans
| to overhaul the way the internet functions in order to apply much greater
| restrictions and control over the web.
|
| Lawrence Lessig, a respected Law Professor from Stanford University told an
| audience at this years Fortune’s Brainstorm Tech conference in Half Moon Bay,
| California, that "There’s going to be an i-9/11 event" which will act as a
| catalyst for a radical reworking of the law pertaining to the internet.
|
| Lessig also revealed that he had learned, during a dinner with former
| government Counter Terrorism Czar Richard Clarke, that there is already in
| existence a cyber equivalent of the Patriot Act, an "i-Patriot Act" if you
| will, and that the Justice Department is waiting for a cyber terrorism event
| in order to implement its provisions.
`----
http://www.infowars.net/articles/august2008/050808i911.htm
Update on China/Tibet cyberattacks (and Russia/Georgia), and call for
testimonials.
,----[ Quote ]
| Also on this same day, I received an interesting update from Greg Walton, a
| SecDev Fellow at the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto who also edits
| the Infowar Monitor.
|
| He's currently in Hong Kong doing pro bono work for the advocacy group Human
| Rights in China, briefing them on security issues and monitoring systems
| during a sensitive time -- the Olympics, recent unrest in Tibetan and Uighur
| regions, and other factors.
`----
http://www.boingboing.net/2008/08/12/update-on-chinatibet.html
Recent:
A Czar for the Digital Peasants
,----[ Quote ]
| One sure sign of a lack of political vision is a rise in the number of pieces
| of acronymic legislation. After September 11, the US Congress passed the
| euphoniously named “Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing
| Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act” the
| initials of which spell out “USA – Patriot.” The Patriot Act is a pretty bad
| piece of legislation, but at least its drafters worked hard on the acronyms
| so that opponents could be labelled “anti-patriot” – a perfect level of
| analysis for Fox News. Admittedly, in this administration, having public
| officials torturing acronyms rather than detainees might be counted as a
| plus, but I still find the whole practice distasteful. I'd suggest that
| politicians vow to vote against any piece of legislation with its own
| normatively loaded acronym, no matter how otherwise appealing. It might make
| them focus a little more on the content.
|
| In any event, Congress has been at it again. The House just passed, and the
| Senate is considering, the Prioritizing Resources and Organization for
| Intellectual Property Act of 2008 – or “Pro-IP” Act. (If it passes, a version
| is sure to be urged on Europe as a matter of “harmonisation.”) Are you
| pro-intellectual property? Then surely you must be for this piece of
| legislation! The name says it all.
`----
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/14aacbc8-41e1-11dd-a5e8-0000779fd2ac.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkineFQACgkQU4xAY3RXLo7vWQCfc8UVPm2umNOTFQ1G5M1bJIy3
1EIAoKz2LbhUcWr+nT1P2GQ4ClF2wJHo
=ePfd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
