<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One Photo, 2.5 Billion Pixels</title>
	<atom:link href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2005/03/21/the-gigapix-project/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2005/03/21/the-gigapix-project/</link>
	<description>Reflections on Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2026 11:00:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.40</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Tobkes</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2005/03/21/the-gigapix-project/comment-page-1/#comment-317</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Tobkes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 17:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2005/03/21/the-gigapix-project/#comment-317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Zooming appears almost infinite, without loss in quality&quot;
maybe if were 2.5 bil dpi, but I think that high number refers to the total pixels in the enomous photo...it&#039;s stil 300 dpi (about 72 on my monitor)
...pretty cool.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Zooming appears almost infinite, without loss in quality&#8221;<br />
maybe if were 2.5 bil dpi, but I think that high number refers to the total pixels in the enomous photo&#8230;it&#8217;s stil 300 dpi (about 72 on my monitor)<br />
&#8230;pretty cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
