<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open Office 2</title>
	<atom:link href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2005/06/21/open-office-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2005/06/21/open-office-2/</link>
	<description>Reflections on Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2026 11:00:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.40</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2005/06/21/open-office-2/comment-page-1/#comment-3355</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Schestowitz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2005 14:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2005/06/21/open-office-2/#comment-3355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A fellow &lt;abbr title=&quot;Linux Users Group&quot;&gt;LUG&lt;/abbr&gt;er , who is in the OO.org Documentation Team, mentioned the date. It was a matter of months at the time, perhaps 1 or 2 months.

I personally use LATEX and only run OO.org a few times a year when a text editor cannot not deal with &lt;code&gt;.doc&lt;/code&gt; files properly enough.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A fellow <abbr title="Linux Users Group">LUG</abbr>er , who is in the OO.org Documentation Team, mentioned the date. It was a matter of months at the time, perhaps 1 or 2 months.</p>
<p>I personally use LATEX and only run OO.org a few times a year when a text editor cannot not deal with <code>.doc</code> files properly enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2005/06/21/open-office-2/comment-page-1/#comment-3340</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Duncan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2005 12:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2005/06/21/open-office-2/#comment-3340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am definately looking foward to the new release, I have been using 1.9 Beta for a while now and it runs pretty fast. My only complaints are that the Style and Formatting toolbar isn&#039;t dockable and the quality of suggestions for mis-spelt words (which isn&#039;t even close to MS Words). 

Any idea when 2.0 is planned for?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am definately looking foward to the new release, I have been using 1.9 Beta for a while now and it runs pretty fast. My only complaints are that the Style and Formatting toolbar isn&#8217;t dockable and the quality of suggestions for mis-spelt words (which isn&#8217;t even close to MS Words). </p>
<p>Any idea when 2.0 is planned for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2005/06/21/open-office-2/comment-page-1/#comment-3336</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2005 07:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2005/06/21/open-office-2/#comment-3336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Always nice to know Microsoft are on the way down!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Always nice to know Microsoft are on the way down!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
