<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OpenOffice 150 Times Cheaper than Microsoft Office?</title>
	<atom:link href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2006/03/19/openoffice-cheaper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2006/03/19/openoffice-cheaper/</link>
	<description>Reflections on Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2026 11:00:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.40</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2006/03/19/openoffice-cheaper/comment-page-1/#comment-5873</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Schestowitz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 14:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2006/03/19/openoffice-cheaper/#comment-5873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for citing this, Solveig.

Microsoft&#039;s FUD campaigns are intended to spread whatever lies serve their purpose. They also contradict IBM&#039;s analysis, which says Linux 45% cheaper to setup and maintain than counterparts. Their deep pockets allow them to make some big noise with their lies too (e.g. Google &#039;linux&#039; and find microsoft.com at the top).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for citing this, Solveig.</p>
<p>Microsoft&#8217;s FUD campaigns are intended to spread whatever lies serve their purpose. They also contradict IBM&#8217;s analysis, which says Linux 45% cheaper to setup and maintain than counterparts. Their deep pockets allow them to make some big noise with their lies too (e.g. Google &#8216;linux&#8217; and find microsoft.com at the top).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OpenOffice.org Training, Tips, and Ideas</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2006/03/19/openoffice-cheaper/comment-page-1/#comment-5871</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[OpenOffice.org Training, Tips, and Ideas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 14:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2006/03/19/openoffice-cheaper/#comment-5871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;OpenOffice 150 Times Cheaper Than Microsoft Office?&lt;/strong&gt;
Yep, that&#039;s the statement from the French. OpenOffice.org is 150 times cheaper than Microsoft Office. And this is the French tax office that&#039;s switching, so you&#039;ve got to think they&#039;ve got the numbers right. The French tax agency claims that]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>OpenOffice 150 Times Cheaper Than Microsoft Office?</strong><br />
Yep, that&#8217;s the statement from the French. OpenOffice.org is 150 times cheaper than Microsoft Office. And this is the French tax office that&#8217;s switching, so you&#8217;ve got to think they&#8217;ve got the numbers right. The French tax agency claims that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Solveig Haugland</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2006/03/19/openoffice-cheaper/comment-page-1/#comment-5870</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Solveig Haugland]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 14:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2006/03/19/openoffice-cheaper/#comment-5870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi, could you correct my trackback? Mistyped  the number as 250, not 150, which is kind of embarrassing. ;&gt; 

Great to hear about this. The whole Microsoft line that open source is more expensive is just ludicrous.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, could you correct my trackback? Mistyped  the number as 250, not 150, which is kind of embarrassing. ;> </p>
<p>Great to hear about this. The whole Microsoft line that open source is more expensive is just ludicrous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
