<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>schestowitz.com &#187; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/category/science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog</link>
	<description>Reflections on Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 21:37:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.40</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Covering Abuse and Lawfare Twice Per Day</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/27/covering-abuse-and-lawfare-twice-per-day/</link>
		<comments>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/27/covering-abuse-and-lawfare-twice-per-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2026 14:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Schestowitz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/?p=9862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The public must know, the law needs to be reformed lans changed after the weather decided to become nice and sunny (blue skies), at least for about half an hour. We went to feed the birds, squirrels soon joined them, and even a crow came (which is highly unusual). Then the drizzle started and we [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The public must know, the law needs to be reformed</em></p>
<p><img src="/IMG/Caps/p.png" border="0" align="left" hspace="0" vspace="4" alt="P" />lans <a href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/27/feels-like-autumn-even-winter/">changed</a> after the weather decided to become nice and sunny (blue skies), at least for about half an hour. We went to feed the birds, squirrels soon joined them, and even a crow came (which is highly unusual). Then the drizzle started and we got back.</p>
<p>I recently decided that coverage related to online abuse against my family and I, especially the lawfare, merits two parts per day.</p>
<p>Why two?</p>
<p>We just have so much material and I don&#8217;t want it to take us decades to cover. I want to move  on and covers science/tech.</p>
<p>Years ago the plan the plan was to cover this 2-3 times per week, now it&#8217;s more than 5 times faster.</p>
<p><strong>Recent</strong>:</p>
<table class="results">
<tr>
<td id="17964">2026-07-29</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/07/29/Brigading_Against_Women_Part_I_Bypassing_the_Legal_System_by_Th.shtml">Brigading Against Women &#8211; Part I &#8211; Bypassing the Legal System by Threatening Companies in Another Continent</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18116">2026-08-04</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/08/04/Brigading_Against_Women_Part_II_Threatening_Women_Using_the_Hum.shtml">Brigading Against Women &#8211; Part II &#8211; Threatening Women Using the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (HRTO) and Then False Threats Miscarrying the Name of a Court</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="19048">2026-09-26</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/09/26/Brigading_Against_Women_Part_III_Racism_Looms_Large_Not_Just_Se.shtml">Brigading Against Women &#8211; Part III &#8211; Racism Looms Large, Not Just Sexism</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="19055">2026-09-26</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/09/26/Brigading_Against_Women_Part_IV_Death_Threats_Threats_to_Women_.shtml">Brigading Against Women &#8211; Part IV &#8211; Death Threats, Threats to Women, and Threats for Pointing Out, Correctly and Based on Hard Evidence, That Garrett and Lozza Talk to Each Other About Me Every Year (for 4 Years)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="19063">2026-09-27</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/09/27/Brigading_Against_Women_Part_V_SWATTING_Extortion_Against_Webho.shtml">Brigading Against Women &#8211; Part V &#8211; SWATTING, Extortion Against Webhosts, and Lawfare Under Sworn Oath (Perjury Also)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15153">2026-03-03</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/03/03/Microsofters_SLAPP_Censorship_Part_1_Out_of_200_Claim_No_KB_202.shtml"> Microsofters&#8217; SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 1 Out of 200: Claim No. KB-2024-001270 in a Nutshell</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15173">2026-03-04</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/03/04/Microsofters_SLAPP_Censorship_Part_2_Out_of_200_Detailed_Timeli.shtml"> Microsofters&#8217; SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 2 Out of 200: Detailed Timeline From 2012 (Attack on Reporters That Question Restricted Boot) to 2024 (Lawsuit Against Reporter and His Wife in Another Continent)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15196">2026-03-05</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/03/05/Microsofters_SLAPP_Censorship_Part_3_Out_of_200_A_More_In_Depth.shtml"> Microsofters&#8217; SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 3 Out of 200: A More In-Depth Breakdown</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15217">2026-03-06</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/03/06/Microsofters_SLAPP_Censorship_Part_4_Out_of_200_Rianne_s_Versio.shtml"> Microsofters&#8217; SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 4 Out of 200: Rianne’s Version of Events and Narrative</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15249">2026-03-07</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/03/07/Microsofters_SLAPP_Censorship_Part_5_Out_of_200_Clearly_Not_a_S.shtml"> Microsofters&#8217; SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 5 Out of 200: Clearly Not a Security Professional/Expert, Only Ever Pretending to be One</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15268">2026-03-08</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/03/08/Microsofters_SLAPP_Censorship_Part_6_Out_of_200_Intentionally_M.shtml"> Microsofters&#8217; SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 6 Out of 200: Intentionally Misnaming Women, People Who Offered to Testify That They Too Had Been Subjected to Similar Abuse</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15287">2026-03-09</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/03/09/Microsofters_SLAPP_Censorship_Part_7_Out_of_200_Like_With_the_S.shtml"> Microsofters&#8217; SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 7 Out of 200: Like With the Serial Strangler From Microsoft, Misuse of UK-GDPR to Try to Hide Embarrassing Facts</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15313">2026-03-10</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/03/10/Microsofters_SLAPP_Censorship_Part_8_Out_of_200_Gross_Misuse_of.shtml"> Microsofters&#8217; SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 8 Out of 200: Gross Misuse of UKGDPR to Protect the Agenda of American Back Doors (Mass Surveillance)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15339">2026-03-11</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/03/11/Microsofters_SLAPP_Censorship_Part_9_Out_of_200_5RB_Barrister_D.shtml"> Microsofters&#8217; SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 9 Out of 200: 5RB Barrister Does Not Even Know the Name of His Own Client (That He Was Paid Well Over $200,000 to &#8216;Speak&#8217; or &#8216;Cover&#8217; for)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15358">2026-03-12</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/03/12/Microsofters_SLAPP_Censorship_Part_10_Out_of_200_Showing_Public.shtml"> Microsofters&#8217; SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 10 Out of 200: Showing Public Tweets is Not a Privacy Violation, But This Isn&#8217;t About Justice, It&#8217;s About Censorship</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15394">2026-03-13</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/03/13/Microsofters_SLAPP_Censorship_Part_11_Out_of_200_Cannot_Censor_.shtml"> Microsofters&#8217; SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 11 Out of 200: Cannot Censor His Spouse, Accusations Are Repeated Today</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15408">2026-03-14</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/03/14/Microsofters_SLAPP_Censorship_Part_12_Out_of_200_Months_Ahead_o.shtml"> Microsofters&#8217; SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 12 Out of 200: Months Ahead of Serial Strangler From Microsoft Who Helped Double the Lawsuits (Funded by Third Parties) as &#8216;Revenge&#8217; for Exposing Crimes</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15429">2026-03-15</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/03/15/Microsofters_SLAPP_Censorship_Part_13_Out_of_200_Abuse_of_Proce.shtml"> Microsofters&#8217; SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 13 Out of 200: Abuse of Process to Make False Accusations of UKGDPR Violations</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15448">2026-03-16</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/03/16/Microsofters_SLAPP_Censorship_Part_14_Out_of_200_The_Abusive_Ca.shtml"> Microsofters&#8217; SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 14 Out of 200: The Abusive Cases of the Serial Strangler From Microsoft and His Litigation Buddy Garrett Did Cause &#8220;Serious Harm&#8221;</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15473">2026-03-17</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/03/17/Microsofters_SLAPP_Censorship_Part_14_Out_of_200_Men_Who_Strang.shtml"> Microsofters&#8217; SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 14 Out of 200: Men Who Strangle Women (and Worse) Trying to Force Us to Write Public Apologies to These Men</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15497">2026-03-18</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/03/18/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_15_Out_of_200_Background_and_Particulars_.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 15 Out of 200: Background and Particulars of Truth Regarding Techrights and Tux Machines</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15519">2026-03-19</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/03/19/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_16_Out_of_200_Detailing_the_Actors_and_Ex.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 16 Out of 200: Detailing the Actors and Explaining Techrights&#8217; Own Internet Relay Chat (IRC) Network</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15543">2026-03-20</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/03/20/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_17_Out_of_200_A_Long_Track_Record_of_Onli.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 17 Out of 200: A Long Track Record of Online Abuse, Then Choosing a Low-Cost Law Firm to Muzzle People Who Have Illuminated This Abuse for Over a Decade</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15566">2026-03-21</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/03/21/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_18_Out_of_200_Third_Parties_Funding_Attac.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 18 Out of 200: Third Parties Funding Attacks on the Messengers, Lawsuits Against GAFAM-Critical Voices That Uphold Real National Security</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15579">2026-03-22</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/03/22/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_19_Out_of_200_They_Were_Ill_prepared_for_.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 19 Out of 200: They Were Ill-prepared for Tough Questions in Cross-Examination</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15598">2026-03-23</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/03/23/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_20_Out_of_200_All_Roads_Lead_to_Rome_and_.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 20 Out of 200: All Roads Lead to Rome and to GAFAM Funding</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15605">2026-03-24</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/03/24/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_21_Out_of_200_It_s_About_Behaviour_Online.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 21 Out of 200: It&#8217;s About Behaviour Online, Not How Much Money From Shadowy Third Parties Gets Spent on Lawyers and Two Barristers</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15619">2026-03-24</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/03/24/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_22_Out_of_200_When_You_Complain_People_Im.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 22 Out of 200: When You Complain People Impersonate You in IRC (But You Yourself Impersonate People in IRC and Lock Them Out of Their IRC Handles)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15631">2026-03-25</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/03/25/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_23_Out_of_200_We_Were_Right_All_Along_for.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 23 Out of 200: We Were Right All Along (for 2 Years) About Third Party Funding and Willingness to &#8216;Break the Bank&#8217; in Pursuit of &#8220;Revenge&#8221;</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15648">2026-03-26</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/03/26/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_24_Out_of_200_The_Failed_Effort_by_Brett_.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 24 Out of 200: The Failed Effort by Brett Wilson LLP to Strike Out My Lawsuit and My Wife&#8217;s Lawsuit Against Garrett (the Master Allowed Our Lawsuits to Proceed)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15672">2026-03-27</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/03/27/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_25_Out_of_200_That_Time_Matthew_J_Garrett.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 25 Out of 200: That Time Matthew J. Garrett Got Temporarily Banned/Suspended From Twitter</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15689">2026-03-28</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/03/28/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_26_Out_of_200_Asking_for_Documents_and_In.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 26 Out of 200: Asking for Documents and Information You Already Have, Even Letters and E-mails That You Yourself Sent!</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15707">2026-03-29</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/03/29/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_27_Out_of_200_Using_the_Tor_Network_to_Hi.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 27 Out of 200: Using the Tor Network to Hide From Consequences</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15728">2026-03-30</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/03/30/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_28_Out_of_200_Facing_Consequences_for_Imp.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 28 Out of 200: Facing Consequences for Impersonation and Worse</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15751">2026-03-31</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/03/31/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_29_Out_of_200_Violent_Language_Won_t_Go_A.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 29 Out of 200: Violent Language Won&#8217;t Go Away When You Use It in Your Site, Blog, and Social Control Media</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15776">2026-04-01</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/04/01/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_30_Out_of_200_The_Time_We_Reported_Abuse_.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 30 Out of 200: The Time We Reported Abuse to Greater Manchester Police (GMP) and It Was Escalated to Its Cybercrime Unit</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15790">2026-04-02</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/04/02/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_31_Out_of_200_Speaking_About_20_Years_of_.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 31 Out of 200: Speaking About 20+ Years of Alleged Harassment/Defamation and High-Profile &#8216;Targets&#8217; of Garrett</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15808">2026-04-03</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/04/03/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_32_Out_of_200_Garrett_Made_Spurious_Reque.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 32 Out of 200: Garrett Made Spurious Requests (Later Withdrawn) the Same Week Someone He Later Spoke to by E-mail Sent Threats to Our Webhost</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15814">2026-04-03</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/04/03/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_33_Out_of_200_Garrett_Sued_by_My_Wife_and.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 33 Out of 200: Garrett Sued by My Wife and I, Then His Microsoft Acquaintance Files Another Lawsuit and Our Webhost Receives Legal Threats Too</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15830">2026-04-04</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/04/04/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_34_Out_of_200_The_Necessity_of_Transparen.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 34 Out of 200: The Necessity of Transparency, Illuminating Garrett&#8217;s and Graveley&#8217;s &#8216;Tag-Team&#8217; Act, Misusing the British Docket (From Far Away in America) in Efforts to Hide Bad Behaviour</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15843">2026-04-05</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/04/05/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_35_Out_of_200_How_to_Make_10_000_Pound_St.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 35 Out of 200: How to Make ~10,000 Pound Sterling (13,220.50 United States Dollars) by Copy-Pasting and Editing 10 Pages</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15865">2026-04-06</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/04/06/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_36_Out_of_200_Claim_KB_2024_003529_in_a_N.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 36 Out of 200: Claim KB-2024-003529 in a Nutshell (Microsoft Employee Does Terrible Things, Then Sues the Reporter in Another Continent)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15890">2026-04-07</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/04/07/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_37_Out_of_200_The_Correct_Suspicion_Garre.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 37 Out of 200: The Correct Suspicion Garrett and Graveley Were Collaborating in Overseas Litigation Against Critics</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15903">2026-04-08</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/04/08/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_38_Out_of_200_Advertisement_or_10_000_Cla.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 38 Out of 200: Advertisement or £10,000+ Classified Ad in the Form of Court Filing in Another Continent</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15916">2026-04-08</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/04/08/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_39_Out_of_200_Recycled_Text_for_Garrett_a.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 39 Out of 200: Recycled Text for Garrett and Graveley (Buy One, Get One Free?)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15922">2026-04-09</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/04/09/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_40_Out_of_200_Putting_Forth_Frivolous_Cla.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 40 Out of 200: Putting Forth Frivolous Claim Only a Few Days Before Running Out of Time (12 Months)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15942">2026-04-10</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/04/10/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_41_Out_of_200_More_Misuse_of_UK_GDPR_for_.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 41 Out of 200: More Misuse of UK-GDPR (for US Citizens), More Copy-Pasting for Garrett and Graveley, Alleging That Publishing Unflattering Information is a &#8216;Privacy&#8217; Issue</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15948">2026-04-10</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/04/10/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_42_Out_of_200_Getting_the_Very_Basic_Tech.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 42 Out of 200: Getting the Very Basic Technical Concepts Very Wrong, or Where Miscomprehension Begets &#8220;Plausible Deniability&#8221;</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15969">2026-04-11</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/04/11/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_43_Out_of_200_Garrett_and_Graveley_Partic.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 43 Out of 200: Garrett and Graveley Particulars of Claims Almost Identical and 5RB Needs to Investigate Its Barristers (Its Reputation is at Stake)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15980">2026-04-12</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/04/12/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_44_Out_of_200_Garrett_and_Graveley_Copypa.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 44 Out of 200: Garrett and Graveley &#8216;Copypasta&#8217; Sunday (Copy-Paste, Add One Word, Change &#8216;T&#8217; to &#8216;t&#8217;)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15993">2026-04-13</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/04/13/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_45_Out_of_200_Garrett_and_Graveley_Cases_.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 45 Out of 200: Garrett and Graveley Cases Inherently the Same, Their Legal Team Can Barely Even Distinguish (Full Timeline)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16002">2026-04-14</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/04/14/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_46_Out_of_200_Alex_Graveley_s_Attorney_Ri.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 46 Out of 200: Alex Graveley&#8217;s Attorney Rick Cofer Did Not Deny That Graveley Had Strangled Women; He Did, However, Pay Local Officials</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16008">2026-04-14</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/04/14/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_47_Out_of_200_British_Courts_Are_Not_Cens.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 47 Out of 200: British Courts Are Not Censorship Offices for Americans Funded by Affluent Third Parties</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16028">2026-04-16</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/04/16/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_48_Out_of_200_Brett_Wilson_LLP_and_5RB_Co.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 48 Out of 200: Brett Wilson LLP and 5RB Copy-Pasting Bogus Claims for Violent Americans (Microsoft) Who Tell Women to Kill Themselves</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16047">2026-04-17</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/04/17/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_49_Out_of_200_Two_Americans_One_Case_Recy.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 49 Out of 200: Two Americans, One Case, Recycled for Low Budget at Brett Wilson LLP and 5RB Barristers</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16059">2026-04-18</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/04/18/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_50_Out_of_200_The_Time_Staff_of_Law_Firm_.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 50 Out of 200: The Time Staff of Law Firm Burgess Mee Was Showing Up in Letters Sent for a Serial Strangler From Microsoft</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16073">2026-04-19</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/04/19/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_51_Out_of_200_On_Perjury_and_What_It_Mean.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 51 Out of 200: On Perjury and What It Means to Take Third-Party Funding to Attack Reporter and His Family (in Another Continent)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16081">2026-04-20</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/04/20/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_52_Out_of_200_Phil_Golding_Appointed_Bar_.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 52 Out of 200: Phil Golding Appointed Bar Standards Board (BSB) Chief, Misogyny Must End</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16111">2026-04-21</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/04/21/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_53_Out_of_200_The_Lying_Solicitor_of_Alex.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 53 Out of 200: The Lying Solicitor of Alex Graveley Left Brett Wilson LLP Only Days or Few Weeks After the Garrett Trial (Attended by Almost Their Entire Office/Team)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16129">2026-04-22</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/04/22/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_54_Out_of_200_Alex_Matt_Automate_Twin_Cas.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 54 Out of 200: Alex-Matt/Automate Twin Cases, Separated at Birth, Drafted by Brett Wilson LLP and 5RB</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16149">2026-04-23</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/04/23/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_55_Out_of_200_Strangled_Women_Charged_for.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 55 Out of 200: Strangled Women, Charged for Strangulation, Cannot Find a Job Now (After Microsoft)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16156">2026-04-24</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/04/24/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_56_Out_of_200_5RB_and_Brett_Wilson_LLP_s_.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 56 Out of 200: 5RB and Brett Wilson LLP&#8217;s Copy-Paste Machination for Garrett and Graveley</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16182">2026-04-25</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/04/25/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_57_Out_of_200_5RB_and_Brett_Wilson_LLP_Ma.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 57 Out of 200: 5RB and Brett Wilson LLP Made the Garrett and Graveley Particulars of Claims a Lot Like Photocopies!</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16196">2026-04-26</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/04/26/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_58_Out_of_200_5RB_and_Brett_Wilson_LLP_He.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 58 Out of 200: 5RB and Brett Wilson LLP Helped Garrett and Graveley Make Equivalent of GAFAM NDAs Superficially &#8216;Enforceable&#8217; in the UK, Using Threats</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16204">2026-04-27</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/04/27/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_59_Out_of_200_Mentioning_the_Fact_Alex_Gr.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 59 Out of 200: Mentioning the Fact Alex Graveley Arrested and Charged for Strangulation in Texas is &#8220;Reckless&#8221; and &#8220;Malicious&#8221;, According to His &#8216;Hired Guns&#8217; in London</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16217">2026-04-28</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/04/28/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_60_Out_of_200_Talking_About_Corruption_at.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 60 Out of 200: Talking About Corruption at Microsoft and Arrest for Strangulation is &#8220;Malice&#8221;</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16246">2026-04-29</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/04/29/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_61_Out_of_200_Garrett_and_Graveley_Must_U.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 61 Out of 200: Garrett and Graveley Must Understand That Reporting Women&#8217;s Issues in the United States of America (“the US”) is Not Impermissible</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16265">2026-04-30</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/04/30/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_62_Out_of_200_Garrett_and_Graveley_Issue_.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 62 Out of 200: Garrett and Graveley Issue Astounding Copy-Paste Masterpiece Asserting Publicly-Accessible Embarrassing Facts Must Remain Hidden</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16275">2026-05-01</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/05/01/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_63_Out_of_200_Graveley_as_a_Stripped_Down.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 63 Out of 200: Graveley as a Stripped-Down Version of Garrett in the Particulars of Claim (5RB Barrister Could Do This in One Minute)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16299">2026-05-02</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/05/02/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_64_Out_of_200_Not_Amused_by_Repeated_Thre.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 64 Out of 200: Not Amused by Repeated Threats (to &#8220;Shut Down&#8221; My &#8220;Existence&#8221; While Mentioning My Wife Too)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16317">2026-05-03</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/05/03/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_65_Out_of_200_Graveley_and_Garrett_Claims.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 65 Out of 200: Graveley and Garrett Claims Are Word-by-Word Similar (They Also Collaborated All Along)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16324">2026-05-04</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/05/04/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_66_Out_of_200_Alex_Graveley_Did_Illegal_T.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 66 Out of 200: Alex Graveley Did Illegal Things, Then Asserted Mentioning Those Illegal Things is Privacy Violation</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16341">2026-05-05</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/05/05/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_67_Out_of_200_Graveley_and_Garrett_Claims.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 67 Out of 200: Graveley and Garrett Claims Against My Wife and I Assert &#8216;Distress&#8217;, But It Was Just a Copy-Pasted Template (Mechanical Crocodile Tears)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16372">2026-05-06</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/05/06/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_68_Out_of_200_Based_on_Their_Particulars_.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 68 Out of 200: Based on Their Particulars of Claims, Microsoft&#8217;s Graveley and Garrett Seem Like the Same Person (Exactly Same Words Used, Sloppily Recycled)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16386">2026-05-07</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/05/07/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_69_Out_of_200_Microsoft_s_Graveley_Strang.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 69 Out of 200: Microsoft&#8217;s Graveley Strangles, Gets Arrested, Charged, Then Asks for Apology From Those Who Reported It by Recycling Garrett&#8217;s Plea for Apology</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16407">2026-05-08</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/05/08/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_70_Out_of_200_Microsoft_s_Graveley_Injunc.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 70 Out of 200: Microsoft&#8217;s Graveley Injunction Request 100% the Same as Garrett&#8217;s (Pure &#8216;Copy-paste&#8217;, Not Even a Word or Single Character Changed!)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16420">2026-05-09</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/05/09/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_71_Out_of_200_5RB_Barristers_Made_Tens_of.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 71 Out of 200: 5RB Barristers Made Tens of Thousands of Pounds by Changing From Plural to Singular for Microsoft&#8217;s Graveley and Garrett</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16430">2026-05-10</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/05/10/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_72_Out_of_200_Microsoft_s_Graveley_and_Ga.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 72 Out of 200: Microsoft&#8217;s Graveley and Garrett Signed Documents That Hold Them Accountable to Truth and Liable for Lies</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16447">2026-05-11</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/05/11/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_73_Out_of_200_Microsoft_s_Graveley_and_Ga.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 73 Out of 200: Microsoft&#8217;s Graveley and Garrett Remain Closely Connected in May 2026 (&#8220;Tag-Teaming&#8221; Against Bloggers in Another Continent)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16461">2026-05-12</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/05/12/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_74_Out_of_200_The_Basis_of_My_Lawsuit_Aga.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 74 Out of 200: The Basis of My Lawsuit Against Alex Graveley, Who Helps Garrett Stack the Docket in Another Continent</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16482">2026-05-12</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/05/12/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_75_Out_of_200_All_True_All_Verifiable_Unl.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 75 Out of 200: All True, All Verifiable, Unlike Garrett and Graveley Lying to at Least Three High Court Judges About What They Did</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16509">2026-05-14</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/05/14/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_76_Out_of_200_The_Problem_With_the_United.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 76 Out of 200: The Problem With the United Kingdom Allowing Americans to File Lawsuits by Proxy (Relayed by &#8220;Hired Guns&#8221;)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16520">2026-05-15</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/05/15/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_77_Out_of_200_They_Never_Knew_How_to_Hand.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 77 Out of 200: They Never Knew How to Handle Women (Except to Attack Them)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16544">2026-05-16</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/05/16/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_78_Out_of_200_Slandering_Me_for_Saying_th.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 78 Out of 200: Slandering Me for Saying the Truth About Graveley and Garrett&#8217;s Abuse of Processes, Stacking Dockets</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16553">2026-05-17</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/05/17/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_79_Out_of_200_They_Will_Soon_Reach_the_10.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 79 Out of 200: They Will Soon Reach the 100 KG (Kilograms) Milestone; Wheelbarrows, Not Justice (Quantity of Legal Papers Sent to Us)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16567">2026-05-18</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/05/18/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_80_Out_of_200_Having_Run_Out_of_Time_to_M.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 80 Out of 200: Having Run Out of Time to Meet a Judge&#8217;s Deadline, Microsoft&#8217;s Graveley Had Garrett&#8217;s Lawyers Argued My ~190-Page Defence and CounterClaim (DCC) Was Unclear About My Position</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16583">2026-05-19</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/05/19/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_81_Out_of_200_SLAPP_Censorship_Does_Not_W.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 81 Out of 200: SLAPP Censorship Does Not Work If Your Sole Strategy is Revenge (and You Attack the Family)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16596">2026-05-20</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/05/20/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_82_Out_of_200_British_Government_Interven.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 82 Out of 200: British Government Intervenes in the SLAPPs by Brett Wilson LLP</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16606">2026-05-20</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/05/20/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_83_Out_of_200_Religion_is_Still_Alive_But.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 83 Out of 200: Religion is Still Alive, But for Many This Religion is Monetary (Greed, Monopolies, Corporate Power)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16627">2026-05-22</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/05/22/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_84_Out_of_200_New_Legislation_Against_SLA.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 84 Out of 200: New Legislation Against SLAPPs on the Way (After We Reached Out to Ministers)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16637">2026-05-23</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/05/23/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_85_Out_of_200_The_United_Kingdom_s_Rating.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 85 Out of 200: The United Kingdom&#8217;s Rating for Press Freedom Has Improved, But We Can Do Even Better</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16653">2026-05-24</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/05/24/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_86_Out_of_200_The_Position_of_Courts_on_C.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 86 Out of 200: The Position of Courts on Computer-Generated Lawsuits and Filings From Another Continent (Made by Two Men Who Work for Slop Companies)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16668">2026-05-25</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/05/25/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_87_Out_of_200_Access_to_Justice.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 87 Out of 200: Access to Justice</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16680">2026-05-26</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/05/26/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_88_Out_of_200_Brett_Wilson_LLP_is_Defamin.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 88 Out of 200: Brett Wilson LLP is Defaming Trans People in America Because Garrett Pays Hired Guns to Silence Them</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16705">2026-05-27</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/05/27/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_89_Out_of_200_SRA_Admits_Malfunction_That.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 89 Out of 200: SRA Admits Malfunction, That&#8217;s Why Transparency is Paramount</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16713">2026-05-28</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/05/28/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_90_Out_of_200_When_Efforts_to_Silence_His.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 90 Out of 200: When Efforts to Silence His Spouse and Also the Wife of a Blogger in Another Continent Only Give More Exposure to Embarrassing Information</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16739">2026-05-29</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/05/29/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_91_Out_of_200_Legal_Aid_in_Support_of_Fre.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 91 Out of 200: Legal Aid in Support of Freedom of the Press and British Women (Attacked by Americans)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16756">2026-05-30</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/05/30/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_92_Out_of_200_A_Spouse_Cannot_be_Turned_O.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 92 Out of 200: A Spouse Cannot be Turned &#8220;On&#8221; and &#8220;Off&#8221; Like a Faucet</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16767">2026-05-31</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/05/31/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_93_Out_of_200_A_Blueprint_of_Reckless_Law.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 93 Out of 200: A Blueprint of Reckless Lawfare in the UK, Waged and Funded by Americans (in Another Continent)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16781">2026-06-01</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/06/01/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_94_Out_of_200_SLAPP_by_Garrett_s_Litigati.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 94 Out of 200: SLAPP by Garrett&#8217;s Litigation Buddy Started 20 Months Ago, He Has Not Even Put in His Defence Yet!</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16796">2026-06-02</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/06/02/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_95_Out_of_200_The_Growing_Risk_of_Tolerat.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 95 Out of 200: The Growing Risk of Tolerating Men Who Abuse and Physically Assault Women</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16827">2026-06-03</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/06/03/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_96_Out_of_200_When_You_Receive_Death_Thre.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 96 Out of 200: When You Receive Death Threats From Anonymous Sockpuppets/Burner Accounts Connected to People Who Strangle Women and Tell Women to Kill Themselves</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16855">2026-06-04</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/06/04/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_97_Out_of_200_Garrett_in_Hiding_From_the_.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 97 Out of 200: Garrett in Hiding (From the Simple Observable Fact He&#8217;s Closely Connected to the Microsofter Who Strangles Women, Tells Women to Kill Themselves, and Worse)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16874">2026-06-04</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/06/04/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_98_Out_of_200_Microsoft_Threatening_Real_.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 98 Out of 200: Microsoft Threatening Real Security Researcher With Criminal Investigation for Talking About Microsoft&#8217;s Bug Doors/Back Doors</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16910">2026-06-06</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/06/06/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_99_Out_of_200_Graveley_and_Garrett_Seem_t.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 99 Out of 200: Graveley and Garrett Seem to Have Crashed Brett Wilson LLP (Worse Than Taking Russian Oligarchs as SLAPP Clients)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16928">2026-06-07</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/06/07/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_100_Out_of_200_Interlude_and_Outline_of_t.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 100 Out of 200: Interlude and Outline of the First Half, 3+ Months That Got Us Death Threats Connected to Brett Wilson LLP (and Cyber Attacks That Are Difficult to Attribute)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16946">2026-06-08</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/06/08/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_101_Out_of_200_Women_Come_to_Realise_They.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 101 Out of 200: Women Come to Realise They Don&#8217;t Wish to Participate in Attacking Vulnerable Women</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16963">2026-06-09</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/06/09/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_102_Out_of_200_Maybe_One_Day_Whistleblowe.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 102 Out of 200: Maybe One Day Whistleblowers From Brett Wilson LLP Will Tell Us What Really Happened</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16973">2026-06-10</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/06/10/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_103_Out_of_200_Telling_People_What_They_K.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 103 Out of 200: Telling People What They Know and Don&#8217;t Know About Death Threats They Receive</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17002">2026-06-12</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/06/12/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_104_Out_of_200_Exactly_Two_Years_Ago_Bret.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 104 Out of 200: Exactly Two Years Ago Brett Wilson LLP Humiliated or Weaponised Our Solicitor&#8217;s Judaism in an Effort to Censor and Gag Us</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17009">2026-06-13</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/06/13/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_105_Out_of_200_When_Bad_Legal_Advice_Resu.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 105 Out of 200: When Bad Legal Advice Results in Your Client, Dale Vince, Ordered to Pay £600k &#8211; or 801,930 United States Dollar (USD) &#8211; to the Person Frivolously Sued (Lord Bailey of Paddington)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17021">2026-06-14</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/06/14/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_106_Out_of_200_100_Kilograms_of_Legal_Pap.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 106 Out of 200: 100 Kilograms of Legal Papers</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17031">2026-06-15</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/06/15/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_107_Out_of_200_Keeping_Law_Accessible_to_.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 107 Out of 200: Keeping Law Accessible to Everybody</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17065">2026-06-16</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/06/16/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_108_Out_of_200_Moving_On_and_Moving_Up.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 108 Out of 200: Moving On and Moving Up</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17087">2026-06-17</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/06/17/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_109_Out_of_200_When_You_Drag_Family_Membe.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 109 Out of 200: When You Drag Family Members Into a Case Unrelated to Them Because Their Relative Published Something</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17096">2026-06-18</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/06/18/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_110_Out_of_200_Anti_SLAPP_Reform_Formally.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 110 Out of 200: Anti-SLAPP Reform Formally Advanced in the United Kingdom (UK) the Same Week the Serial Strangler From Microsoft (US) Does Forum-Shopping in the UK</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17119">2026-06-19</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/06/19/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_111_Out_of_200_Garrett_and_Graveley_the_L.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 111 Out of 200: Garrett and Graveley (the Latter Arrested for Strangling Women) Keep Ousting Their Collaboration in Litigation, Lawfare in a Foreign Continent</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17134">2026-06-20</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/06/20/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_112_Out_of_200_Strangles_Women_Then_Refus.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 112 Out of 200: Strangles Women, Then Refuses to Even Attend Any of His Own Hearings About It</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17143">2026-06-21</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/06/21/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_113_Out_of_200_The_United_Kingdom_is_Not_.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 113 Out of 200: The United Kingdom is Not Turkey</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17160">2026-06-22</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/06/22/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_114_Out_of_200_Thousands_Articles_to_Come.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 114 Out of 200: Thousands of Long Articles to Come, Properly Covering the SLAPP Industry in the UK and Its Modus Operandi</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17173">2026-06-23</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/06/23/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_115_Out_of_200_Spending_the_Next_Decade_W.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 115 Out of 200: Spending the Next Decade Writing About SLAPPs and Trying to Fix the System</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17182">2026-06-23</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/06/23/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_116_Out_of_200_5_Years_of_Multiparty_Lawf.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 116 Out of 200: 5 Years of Multiparty Lawfare Against Techrights, Funded by Americans and Also by Third Parties (Including Microsoft Salaries)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17198">2026-06-24</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/06/24/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_117_Out_of_200_Libel_Tourism_or_Defamatio.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 117 Out of 200: Libel Tourism or Defamation Forum-Shopping in the United Kingdom Condemned by the European Union (EU)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17213">2026-06-25</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/06/25/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_118_Out_of_200_Exposing_Crimes_is_Not_a_C.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 118 Out of 200: Exposing Crimes is Not a Crime, It is a Public Service</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17230">2026-06-26</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/06/26/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_119_Out_of_200_Our_Suggestions_to_Our_Pol.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 119 Out of 200: Our Suggestions to Our Politicians and Heads of State</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17277">2026-06-27</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/06/27/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_120_Out_of_200_Garrett_Undermines_His_Own.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 120 Out of 200: Garrett Undermines His Own Application Because His Friend Graveley Failed to Accomplish What They Had Both Aimed For</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17287">2026-06-28</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/06/28/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_121_Out_of_200_One_Day_We_ll_Discover_Wha.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 121 Out of 200: One Day We&#8217;ll Discover What Company or Rich Person/s Funded the Lawfare Against Us</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17322">2026-06-29</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/06/29/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_122_Out_of_200_Garrett_s_Solicitors_Confi.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 122 Out of 200: Garrett&#8217;s Solicitors Confirm That Garrett is Ban-Evading and Spying on Our IRC Network</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17337">2026-06-30</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/06/30/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_123_Out_of_200_Why_Violence_Against_Anima.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 123 Out of 200: Why Violence Against Animals Matters</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17369">2026-07-01</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/07/01/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_124_Out_of_200_The_Court_Deems_My_Wife_Co.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 124 Out of 200: The Court Deems My Wife Connected to the Case of the Serial Strangler From Microsoft, Invites Her to the Hearing Last Week</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17397">2026-07-02</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/07/02/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_125_Out_of_200_Litigants_in_Person_LIPs_H.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 125 Out of 200: Litigants in Person (LIPs) Handling American Lawfare Funded by Third Parties (About a Million Pounds for 100 Kilograms of Legal Papers)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17415">2026-07-03</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/07/03/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_126_Out_of_200_Becoming_More_Aggressive_A.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 126 Out of 200: Becoming More Aggressive Against Us Only Proves Us Right</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17445">2026-07-04</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/07/04/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_127_Out_of_200_Lawsuits_by_Americans_File.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 127 Out of 200: Lawsuits by Americans Filed in the UK a Burden on British Taxpayers, No Way to Recover the Funds When Americans Lose Their Cases</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17473">2026-07-05</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/07/05/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_128_Out_of_200_Making_Laws_Work_for_Brita.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 128 Out of 200: Making Laws Work for Britain, Not Oversensitive Americans Looking for &#8216;Revenge&#8217; by Lawfare</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17497">2026-07-06</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/07/06/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_129_Out_of_200_Iranian_Tactics.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 129 Out of 200: Iranian Tactics</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17518">2026-07-06</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/07/06/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_130_Out_of_200_Jealousy_Envy_Hubris.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 130 Out of 200: Jealousy, Envy, Hubris</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17526">2026-07-07</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/07/07/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_131_Out_of_200_A_Big_Win_for_the_Media_in.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 131 Out of 200: A Big Win for the Media in the United Kingdom (UK) Today</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17531">2026-07-07</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/07/07/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_132_Out_of_200_When_You_Cannot_Pay_a_Mill.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 132 Out of 200: When You Cannot Pay a Million Pounds (1,335,520.00 United States Dollar) to Lawyers But Have a Strong Community</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17973">2026-07-29</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/07/29/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_133_Out_of_200_Lies_by_Omission.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 133 Out of 200: Lies by Omission</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18002">2026-07-30</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/07/30/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_134_Out_of_200_What_Majority_Rules_Tell_U.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 134 Out of 200: What &#8220;Majority Rules&#8221; Tell Us About the Litigant</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18024">2026-07-31</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/07/31/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_135_Out_of_200_Limited_Liability_Partners.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 135 Out of 200: Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) That Does Not Disclose Financial Activities Before August</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18033">2026-08-01</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/08/01/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_136_Out_of_200_Lawyers_That_Get_Paid_to_M.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 136 Out of 200: Lawyers That Get Paid to Mess About</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18057">2026-08-02</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/08/02/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_137_Out_of_200_Discovering_That_Spending_.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 137 Out of 200: Discovering That Spending a Million British Pounds (1,348,250.01 United States Dollars) on Lawyers Cannot Take Down One&#8217;s Critics</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18095">2026-08-03</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/08/03/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_138_Out_of_200_Garrett_Has_Basically_Lost.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 138 Out of 200: Garrett Has Basically &#8220;Lost&#8221; and It is &#8220;Embarrassing&#8221; to Them</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18118">2026-08-04</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/08/04/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_139_Out_of_200_Solicitors_Regulation_Auth.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 139 Out of 200: Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) Needs More Public Scrutiny (New Management Changed Nothing, It&#8217;s Costing a Lot of Taxpayers&#8217; Money)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18150">2026-08-05</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/08/05/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_140_Out_of_200_You_Become_What_You_Eat_Yo.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 140 Out of 200: You Become What You Eat, Your Clients Become You</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18159">2026-08-06</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/08/06/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_141_Out_of_200_Brett_Wilson_LLP_Failed_to.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 141 Out of 200: Brett Wilson LLP Failed to Learn From the Mistakes of the European Patent Office (EPO)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18192">2026-08-07</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/08/07/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_142_Out_of_200_GemText_is_Not_a_Webpage_G.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 142 Out of 200: GemText is Not a Webpage, Gemini Protocol is Not the Web, and Capsules Are Not Websites</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18211">2026-08-08</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/08/08/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_143_Out_of_200_After_Nearly_10_Attempts_t.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 143 Out of 200: After Nearly 10 Attempts to Settle With Us and Over a Million Pounds Spent on Lawyers and Barristers</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18227">2026-08-09</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/08/09/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_144_Out_of_200_The_Hired_Guns_Media_at_BW.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 144 Out of 200: The &#8220;Hired Guns&#8221; (&#8220;Media&#8221; at BW) Shrank Almost Three-Fold Since They Sued Us in 2024</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18238">2026-08-10</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/08/10/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_145_Out_of_200_They_Tried_Hard_to_Hide_th.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 145 Out of 200: They Tried Hard to Hide the Fact Their Client Had Been Sued, Twice Even</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18267">2026-08-11</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/08/11/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_146_Out_of_200_An_Industry_of_Plagiarism_.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 146 Out of 200: An Industry of Plagiarism, &#8216;Normalised&#8217;</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18287">2026-08-12</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/08/12/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_148_Out_of_200_The_SLAPP_Series_is_Slow_B.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 147 Out of 200: The SLAPP Series is &#8216;Slow&#8217; Because Timing Matters</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18317">2026-08-13</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/08/13/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_148_Out_of_200_The_Manosphere.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 148 Out of 200: The Manosphere</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18333">2026-08-14</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/08/14/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_149_Out_of_200_It_Took_a_Long_Time_to_Sho.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 149 Out of 200: It Took a Long Time to Show What Jason Arday (at Cambridge) and Harvey Weinstein (in Hollywood) Really Were</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18352">2026-08-15</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/08/15/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_150_Out_of_200_Always_Independently_Verif.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 150 Out of 200: Always Independently Verify What People Claim to Be (or Find Yourself in a Jason Arday-Type Moment/Dilemma)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18370">2026-08-16</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/08/16/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_151_Out_of_200_Dealing_With_Sleazy_People.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 151 Out of 200: Dealing With Sleazy People and Companies That Steal (While Employing These Sleazy People)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18385">2026-08-17</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/08/17/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_152_Out_of_200_Injunctions_Do_Not_Cover_C.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 152 Out of 200: Injunctions Do Not Cover Criticism, They Have Scope</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18401">2026-08-18</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/08/18/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_153_Out_of_200_Decades_of_Debt_Weaponisin.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 153 Out of 200: Decades of Debt, Weaponising Borrowed Money to Try to Put Their Critics in Debt</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18433">2026-08-19</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/08/19/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_154_Out_of_200_Computer_Generated_Legal_F.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 154 Out of 200: Computer-Generated Legal Filings From Men Who Are Salaried by Mass Plagiarism Companies in Another Continent (America)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18440">2026-08-20</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/08/20/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_155_Out_of_200_Throwing_Stones_in_Houses_.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 155 Out of 200: Throwing Stones in Houses Made of Glass</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18451">2026-08-21</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/08/21/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_156_Out_of_200_Brett_Wilson_LLP_Becoming_.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 156 Out of 200: Brett Wilson LLP Becoming Wilson FC</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18460">2026-08-21</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/08/21/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_157_Out_of_200_What_is_a_Defamation_Troll.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 157 Out of 200: What is a &#8216;Defamation Troll&#8217;?</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18474">2026-08-22</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/08/22/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_158_Out_of_200_Making_Alliances_With_Men_.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 158 Out of 200: Making Alliances With Men Arrested for Strangling Women Was Always a Terrible Strategy</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18487">2026-08-23</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/08/23/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_159_Out_of_200_Telling_Courts_False_Infor.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 159 Out of 200: Telling Courts False Information and Spoon-feeding Them Insults, Hoping or Expecting Them to Repeat These Insults</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18504">2026-08-24</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/08/24/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_160_Out_of_200_In_Astounding_Repetition_o.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 160 Out of 200: In Astounding Repetition of Last Year, Brett Wilson LLP Deliberately Ignores Holidays of People It is Attacking and Crushes Principles of Access to Justice</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18519">2026-08-25</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/08/25/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_161_Out_of_200_Low_Standards_in_Defamatio.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 161 Out of 200: Low Standards in Defamation Cases Just Muddy the Waters and Distract From Legitimate Cases</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18535">2026-08-26</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/08/26/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_162_Out_of_200_An_Outline_of_Events.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 162 Out of 200: An Outline of Events</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18555">2026-08-27</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/08/27/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_163_Out_of_200_Attack_on_Computer_Science.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 163 Out of 200: Attack on Computer Science and on Computer Security (or Associating Back Doors and Kill Switches With &#8220;Security&#8221;)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18571">2026-08-28</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/08/28/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_164_Out_of_200_Patent_Troll_SLAPPs_Defama.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 164 Out of 200: Patent Troll SLAPPs, Defamation Trolls, and Stranglers From America</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18580">2026-08-29</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/08/29/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_165_Out_of_200_Two_Years_Since_My_Wife_an.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 165 Out of 200: Two Years Since My Wife and I Sued</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18592">2026-08-30</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/08/30/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_166_Out_of_200_Garrett_Wasn_t_Found_Innoc.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 166 Out of 200: Garrett Wasn&#8217;t Found Innocent Per Se, the Court Wanted More Evidence of Who Was Behind Particular Accounts Using Tor</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18613">2026-08-31</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/08/31/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_167_Out_of_200_The_Court_of_Appeal_Might_.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 167 Out of 200: The Court of Appeal Might be the Next Step</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18649">2026-09-01</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/09/01/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_168_Out_of_200_When_Choosing_Clients_Reck.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 168 Out of 200: When Choosing Clients Recklessly and Poorly Self-Harm is Inevitable</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18671">2026-09-02</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/09/02/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_169_Out_of_200_Calling_People_Nazis.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 169 Out of 200: Calling People &#8220;Nazis&#8221;</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18685">2026-09-03</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/09/03/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_170_Out_of_200_Downtimes.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 170 Out of 200: Downtimes</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18702">2026-09-04</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/09/04/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_171_Out_of_200_Talking_About_Corruption_a.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 171 Out of 200: Talking About Corruption and Violence Against Women</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18716">2026-09-05</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/09/05/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_172_Out_of_200_The_Solicitors_Regulation_.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 172 Out of 200: The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) Complicit in the SLAPPs by Inaction (Didn&#8217;t Even Study Any Evidence, Only Wasted Time and Budget)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18727">2026-09-06</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/09/06/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_173_Out_of_200_Two_Years.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 173 Out of 200: Two Years</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18746">2026-09-07</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/09/07/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_174_Out_of_200_Cascading_Scandals_and_a_P.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 174 Out of 200: Cascading Scandals and a Path Towards Much-Needed, Long-Awaited Reform</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18759">2026-09-08</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/09/08/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_175_Out_of_200_Implicit_and_Explicit_Coal.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 175 Out of 200: Implicit and Explicit Coalition Against the UK&#8217;s SLAPP Industry</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18772">2026-09-09</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/09/09/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_176_Out_of_200_The_Sex_Obsessed_Non_Exper.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 176 Out of 200: The Sex-Obsessed Non-Experts</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18780">2026-09-09</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/09/09/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_177_Out_of_200_Manosphere_Without_Financi.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 177 Out of 200: Manosphere Without Financial Transparency</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18798">2026-09-11</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/09/11/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_178_Out_of_200_Explaining_to_Your_America.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 178 Out of 200: Explaining to Your American Clients That Spending 130,000+ United States Dollars on a Single Hearing in Another Continent Means the UK&#8217;s National Archives Will Retain in Perpetuity What Your Spouse or Girlfriend Said</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18819">2026-09-12</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/09/12/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_179_Out_of_200_Using_One_s_Clients_to_Sav.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 179 Out of 200: Using One&#8217;s Clients to Save Face at Their Expense</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18821">2026-09-12</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/09/12/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_180_Out_of_200_A_Third_Act_Mis_Using_Your.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 180 Out of 200: A Third Act, (Mis)Using Your Client&#8217;s Application to the Court for Your Own Purposes as a Law Firm (Reputation Management and Censorship)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18833">2026-09-13</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/09/13/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_181_Out_of_200_This_is_Really_More_Like_B.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 181 Out of 200: This is Really More Like Brett Wilson LLP v Schestowitz (Using Money From American Slop Companies, Plagiarism Pushers)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18837">2026-09-13</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/09/13/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_182_Out_of_200_UK_Dockets_With_Machine_Ge.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 182 Out of 200: UK Dockets With Machine-Generated Applications to the Court (From American Slop Companies)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18852">2026-09-14</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/09/14/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_183_Out_of_200_What_Actually_Happened_Two.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 183 Out of 200: What Actually Happened Two Months Ago (Based on People Who Attended)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18870">2026-09-15</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/09/15/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_184_Out_of_200_A_Tiny_Law_Firm_That_Knows.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 184 Out of 200: A Tiny Law Firm That Knows Nothing But Microsoft (But Merely Pretends to Understand &#8220;IT&#8221;)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18887">2026-09-16</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/09/16/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_185_Out_of_200_What_Reputation.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 185 Out of 200: What Reputation?</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18898">2026-09-16</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/09/16/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_186_Out_of_200_Love_Always_Commands.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 186 Out of 200: Love (Always Commands)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18906">2026-09-17</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/09/17/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_187_Out_of_200_Reminding_Ourselves_of_the.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 187 Out of 200: Reminding Ourselves of the Great Damage Garrett Did to Linux (for Microsoft)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18916">2026-09-18</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/09/18/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_188_Out_of_200_Used_Then_Discarded_by_Mic.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 188 Out of 200: Used, Then Discarded, by Microsoft (as We Predicted All Along, It&#8217;s Always Like That)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18936">2026-09-19</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/09/19/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_189_Out_of_200_A_Terrible_Idea_to_Condemn.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 189 Out of 200: A Terrible Idea to Condemn Projects for Using Slop &#8216;Code&#8217; When Your Own Employer Does This (and Profits From Every Company Doing So) or to Call Distros &#8216;Not Secure&#8217; While You Advance Back Doors</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18946">2026-09-20</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/09/20/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_190_Out_of_200_Plagiarism_Back_Doors_and_.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 190 Out of 200: Plagiarism, Back Doors, and Sabotage of Linux</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18956">2026-09-21</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/09/21/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_191_Out_of_200_Garrett_Graveley_and_Lozza.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 191 Out of 200: Garrett, Graveley and Lozza</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18960">2026-09-21</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/09/21/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_192_Out_of_200_The_Hired_Guns_of_Garrett_.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 192 Out of 200: The Hired Guns of Garrett and Graveley Sent Us USB Sticks (One to Me, One to My Wife) Showing Lozza Talking to Garrett About Censoring/Deplatforming Techrights the Same Time Graveley Was Copy-Pasting Garrett&#8217;s Lawsuit</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18968">2026-09-22</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/09/22/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_193_Out_of_200_Breaks_GNU_and_Linux_Tries.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 193 Out of 200: Breaks GNU and Linux, Tries to Silence Critics, Loses All Money, Looks for Microsoft Allies and Sponsors</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18975">2026-09-22</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/09/22/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_194_Out_of_200_The_Court_Needs_to_Also_Lo.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 194 Out of 200: The Court Needs to Also Look Into Microsoft-Controlled Restricted Boot Advanced by An American (Garrett) to Promote Monopoly and Back Doors Everywhere</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18986">2026-09-23</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/09/23/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_195_Out_of_200_Two_Years_Since_Garrett_Gr.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 195 Out of 200: Two Years Since Garrett, Graveley and Lozza Worked in Parallel to Censor Techrights</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18993">2026-09-23</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/09/23/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_196_Out_of_200_Sending_Someone_to_Our_Doo.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 196 Out of 200: Sending Someone to Our Doorstep to Ship Approximately 5 KG of Legal Papers (Instead of to Our Representatives)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="19004">2026-09-24</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/09/24/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_197_Out_of_200_Garrett_Became_So_Poor_Tha.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 197 Out of 200: Garrett Became So Poor That He Wants Others (in Another Continent) to Pay for His Own Legal Work Being Faulty</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="19006">2026-09-24</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/09/24/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_198_Out_of_200_It_Sounds_Like_Garrett_is_.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 198 Out of 200: It Sounds Like Garrett is Now Sending People to Silence Critics (Including His Own Spouse)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="19019">2026-09-25</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/09/25/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_199_Out_of_200_An_American_Burden_on_the_.shtml"> SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 199 Out of 200: An American Burden on the British Legal System</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="19026">2026-09-25</td>
<td><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/09/25/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_200_Out_of_200_Will_GNU_Boot_Undo_the_Tec.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 200 Out of 200: Will GNU Boot Undo the Technical Damage Caused by Microsoft and Garrett? (And Garrett&#8217;s Litigation Allies From Microsoft)</a></td>
</tr>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/27/covering-abuse-and-lawfare-twice-per-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You Lose the Ability to Think and Forget Skills</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/26/you-lose-the-ability-to-think-and-forget-skills/</link>
		<comments>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/26/you-lose-the-ability-to-think-and-forget-skills/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2026 06:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Schestowitz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Memories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/?p=9832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#8217;t do that think I was about 3 when I was in a particular place and time and can still vaguely remember that place and time. I also think that psychologists deem this to be normal, based on the belief people cannot have any vivid memories of them being 1 or 2 (belief; we cannot [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Don&#8217;t do that</em></p>
<p><img title="I" src="/IMG/Caps/i.png" alt="I" align="left" border="0" hspace="0" vspace="4" /> think I was <u>about 3</u> when I was in a particular place and time and can still vaguely remember that place and time. I also think that psychologists deem this to be normal, based on the belief people cannot have any vivid memories of them being 1 or 2 (<b>belief</b>; we cannot &#8220;read&#8221; brains). I don&#8217;t know why, but it&#8217;s something to do with memory retention in the brain as it ages. I also think that recollection requires rehearsal, so in order for me to remember some moment from age 3 I&#8217;d need to recall that at age 5, then 7, 10 and so on. It reinforces that memory.</p>
<p>The same is true for adults in their professional lives. Without exercising some skill regularly, that skill will be lost.</p>
<p>This is one strong argument against using slop, either in a business (collective skills/retention thereof) or as an individual.</p>
<p>Also see this new blog post: <a href="https://lemire.me/blog/2026/09/24/if-you-dont-have-the-factories-you-lose-the-expertise/">If you don’t have the factories, you lose the expertise</a></p>
<p>Ignore how he uses for slop for images (hypocrisy when it comes to LLMs for code, too). To quote: <em>&#8220;If you have the factories, sooner or later, you get the designers. If you don’t have the factories, you lose the expertise. Or you never get it. There aren’t that many people left in the Silicon Valley capable of working on silicon. You can design a chip from California. Making one is done where the fab is. You can get a PhD in robotics in Quebec City, but you won’t be designing robots unless you fly over to where they are made. Zoom calls won’t cut it at scale.&#8221;</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/26/you-lose-the-ability-to-think-and-forget-skills/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Autumn &#8220;Officially&#8221; Began Today</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/23/autumn-officially-began-today/</link>
		<comments>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/23/autumn-officially-began-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 08:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Schestowitz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/?p=9762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The real and meaningful astronomical event realise that the 2026 autumn equinox is upon us (Source: BBC) and it&#8217;s not the same as solstice. Quoting the article: &#8220;The equinox will occur at 01:06 BST on 23 September, according to Royal Museums Greenwich. It is a precise moment in time when the Sun crosses the celestial [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The real and meaningful astronomical event</em></p>
<p><img title="I" src="/IMG/Caps/i.png" alt="I" align="left" border="0" hspace="0" vspace="4" /> realise that the 2026 autumn equinox <a href="https://www.bbc.com/weather/articles/cj067v5215zo">is upon us</a> (Source: BBC) and it&#8217;s not the same as solstice. Quoting the article: <em>&#8220;The equinox will occur at 01:06 BST on 23 September, according to Royal Museums Greenwich. It is a precise moment in time when the Sun crosses the celestial equator and neither hemisphere is tilted towards or away from the Sun, meaning day and night are roughly equal in length across the world.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Goodbye, summer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/23/autumn-officially-began-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Still Inspired by Chris</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/21/still-inspired-by-chris/</link>
		<comments>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/21/still-inspired-by-chris/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 04:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Schestowitz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Memories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/?p=9722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[think that based on my records, I started my Ph.D. on &#8220;Tuesday 23rd September, 2003&#8243; or maybe that was just my first meeting (21st September was likely my first day). I wrote this report a week later. Prior to that I had met or &#8220;interviewed&#8221; &#8211; if that&#8217;s the right term &#8211; 3 people in [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Chris-Taylor.png"><img src="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Chris-Taylor.png" alt="Chris Taylor" width="487" height="419" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-9723" /></a></p>
<p><img title="I" src="/IMG/Caps/i.png" alt="I" align="left" border="0" hspace="0" vspace="4" /> think that based on <a href="https://schestowitz.com/Research/Progress/">my records</a>, I started my Ph.D. on &#8220;Tuesday 23rd September, 2003&#8243; or maybe that was just my first meeting (21st September was likely my first day). I wrote <a href="https://schestowitz.com/Research/Progress/Reports/RSPRS001.pdf">this report</a> a week later. Prior to that I had met or &#8220;interviewed&#8221; &#8211; if that&#8217;s the right term &#8211; 3 people in that department regarding a project and/or supervisor (I think that was Jim, Sue, and Chris).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad, <em>in hindsight</em>, that I chose Chris. Despite him being a demanding perfectionist (months later a student of his, Gareth, committed suicide), he did inspire or encourage certain traits I still have. I remember a prior student, Kate, complaining about his attitude in a dinner, saying he&#8217;s &#8220;always right&#8221; (cynically, something to that effect), but his track record or credentials compensated for this attitude.</p>
<p>Having high expectations can be a burden on others.</p>
<p>23 years later Chris is still alive (in his 80s) and shows up in fairly new videos of the same university where he studied and  worked for about 60 years. He&#8217;s still professionally active, at 80 or above. That part of him I really appreciate. I hope that I too can do the  same things 40 years from now.</p>
<p>Chris was always a heavy drinker of coffee, who clearly didn&#8217;t get enough sleep. This seems not to have shortened his life. He did what he loved. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/21/still-inspired-by-chris/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Would Simply Not Assert That I Have Reputation If I Were a Potty-mouth Who Cannot Get Even a Single &#8216;Like&#8217; in 2+ Hours</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/18/i-would-simply-not-assert-that-i-have-reputation-if-i-were-a-potty-mouth-who-cannot-get-even-a-single-like-in-2-hours/</link>
		<comments>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/18/i-would-simply-not-assert-that-i-have-reputation-if-i-were-a-potty-mouth-who-cannot-get-even-a-single-like-in-2-hours/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 07:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Schestowitz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/?p=9673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cursing all day long like a drunkard he irrelevant loser who sends my wife and I veiled threats via social control media (all he ever does to people is threaten them; he does so even to his own spouse) is talking to himself again. Nobody bothers reading what he says, yet he insists that he [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Cursing all day long like a drunkard</em></p>
<p><a href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/fuck-talk.png"><img src="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/fuck-talk.png" alt="Ah right this is the first Thinkpad I've had that does the firmware based power fuckery instead of using DPTF so now I have another problem to fix" width="520" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-9674" /></a></p>
<p><img title="T" src="/IMG/Caps/t.png" alt="T" align="left" border="0" hspace="0" vspace="4" />he irrelevant loser who <a href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/18/matt-garrett-has-just-threatened-in-public-to-send-people-to-our-home/">sends my wife and I veiled threats via social control media</a> (all he ever does to people is threaten them; he does so <u>even to his own spouse</u>) is talking to himself again. Nobody bothers reading what he says, yet he insists that <a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/09/16/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_185_Out_of_200_What_Reputation.shtml">he has reputation</a>. When it comes to technology, 2-3 days were not enough for him to fix a laptop and he simply gave up. This means that his lack of reputation in tech is also self-evident. He has no publications in that area because he is a <a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/03/21/Never_Trust_People_Who_Write_Their_Own_Wikipedia_Pages_Vanity_P.shtml">pretending-at-best socialite</a> and a thug, a bully.</p>
<p>Dealing with bullies is a common problem. There are ways to deal with it.</p>
<p>Having become known for restricted boot <b>infamy</b>, he is not popular. As a purveyor of restricted boot (who landed restricted boot in Linux), he&#8217;s known for sucking up to monopolies. He acts like them, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/18/i-would-simply-not-assert-that-i-have-reputation-if-i-were-a-potty-mouth-who-cannot-get-even-a-single-like-in-2-hours/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Water More Critical Than Food</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/13/water-more-critical-than-food/</link>
		<comments>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/13/water-more-critical-than-food/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 14:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Schestowitz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/?p=9528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Water is life ast month our government formally advised people to prepare for climate problems (natural or man-made disasters) and/or war. I think it meant the latter, but officials tried to avoid causing panic or panic-buying. It basically urged stockpiling, focusing on things like water, canned food, maybe essential (life-sustaining) medicine. Putting aside food and [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Water is <u>life</u></em></p>
<p><img title="L" src="/IMG/Caps/l.png" alt="L" align="left" border="0" hspace="0" vspace="4" />ast month our government <b>formally</b> advised people to prepare for climate problems (natural or man-made disasters) and/or war. I think it meant the latter,    but officials tried to avoid causing panic or panic-buying. It basically urged stockpiling, focusing on things like water, canned food, maybe essential (life-sustaining) medicine.</p>
<p>Putting aside food and the NHS, let&#8217;s focus on water today.</p>
<p>In the UK, rain-catching barrels (or very large plastic containers) are unlawful. I didn&#8217;t check why, but I think it&#8217;s for sanitary reasons (people drinking from it, getting ill, asking NHS to intervene, i.e. becoming a burden on the state&#8217;s capacity/budget).</p>
<p>Suppose a war broke out, water supplies got disrupted, and people here would rather die than recycle and drink urine (a feasible survival strategy by the way).</p>
<p>In a country like ours, for two adults, you can assume 1) no tap water, no sewer, but waste can be managed another way/s (liquid absorbed by soil if you&#8217;re not in a high-floor apartment); 2) about 5 litres per day for a couple or 150 litres consumed per month; 3) water is preferable (over other liquids); 4) insulation needed (for all liquids). Boiling not an option if power is out.</p>
<p>For a typical household, water usually runs out first; food is less critical than water because we&#8217;re about 80% water. People tend  to underestimate how much water they consume (digested, not washing/bathing related usage) and people can consume their own muscle and fats (the body  metabolise its own mass). It&#8217;s all OK, except for water&#8230;</p>
<p>No doubt water is essential.</p>
<p>I am <b>not</b> saying we&#8217;ll 1) have a war soon and 2) it will disrupt the water supply.</p>
<p>I am only describing a scenario where people stockpile the wrong thing/s. Or prioritise (weight-wise) what&#8217;s more expensive and less critical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/13/water-more-critical-than-food/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cited This Weekend in ACM (Association for Computing Machinery)</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/06/cited-this-weekend-in-acm-association-for-computing-machinery/</link>
		<comments>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/06/cited-this-weekend-in-acm-association-for-computing-machinery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2026 17:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Schestowitz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/?p=9402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[High-profile publisher n some sense, today was a special day. It&#8217;s about science, not football. I did not watch this London match, I only followed the score, hoping both teams would lose points (more so Arsenal). While keeping an eye on the score I noticed having been cited in a major publication. As it turns [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>High-profile publisher</em></p>
<p><img title="I" src="/IMG/Caps/i.png" alt="I" align="left" border="0" hspace="0" vspace="4" />n <b>some sense</b>, today was a special day.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s about science, not football.</p>
<p>I did not watch <a href="https://www.premierleague.com/en/match/2645215/arsenal-vs-chelsea/overview">this London match</a>, I only followed the score, hoping both teams would lose points (more so Arsenal).</p>
<p>While keeping an eye on the score I noticed <a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/09/06/Association_for_Computing_Machinery_Cites_Techrights_in_Relatio.shtml">having been cited in a major publication</a>. As it turns out, an old article of mine has just been cited in ACM (Association for Computing Machinery) and it&#8217;s about Gemini Protocol where <a href="gemini://gemini.bortzmeyer.org/software/lupa/stats.gmi">my writings became more prominent in recent years</a>:</p>
<p><a href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/3539-capsules.png"><img src="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/3539-capsules.png" alt="There are 5152 capsules. We successfully connected recently to 3539 of them." width="514" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-9403" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/06/cited-this-weekend-in-acm-association-for-computing-machinery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Banking by Post, Not &#8220;Apps&#8221; and &#8220;Web Sites&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/06/banking-by-post-not-apps-and-web-sites/</link>
		<comments>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/06/banking-by-post-not-apps-and-web-sites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2026 03:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Schestowitz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/?p=9390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Outsourcing of the work to the customers t is arguably bizarre that some of the more/most computer-literate people are trying hardest to avoid computers where those computers objectively introduce risk. In the case of banks, I still receive statements in the post, I never use a bank&#8217;s &#8220;app&#8221; (I don&#8217;t have a &#8220;smart&#8221; &#8220;phone&#8221;) and [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Outsourcing of the work to the customers</em></p>
<p><img title="I" src="/IMG/Caps/i.png" alt="I" align="left" 
border="0" hspace="0" vspace="4" />t is arguably bizarre that some of the more/most computer-literate people are trying <b>hardest</b> to avoid computers where those computers objectively introduce risk.</p>
<p>In the case of banks, I still receive statements in the post, I never use a bank&#8217;s &#8220;app&#8221; (I don&#8217;t have a &#8220;smart&#8221; &#8220;phone&#8221;) and when something important needs to get done, I&#8217;ll quite likely go to a local branch of the bank.</p>
<p>Before computer ownership and Internet connection was simply assumed (now the same for &#8220;smart&#8221; &#8220;phones&#8221;) banks provided actual services and were held responsible for mistakes they made.</p>
<p>So we&#8217;ve lost something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/09/06/banking-by-post-not-apps-and-web-sites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Never Claimed to be a Medical Doctor</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/23/i-never-claimed-to-be-a-medical-doctor/</link>
		<comments>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/23/i-never-claimed-to-be-a-medical-doctor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2026 14:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Schestowitz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/?p=9035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[think there are many people in society that are imposters and very well know they are imposters. So what bothers them most are critics and people who expose that they&#8217;re imposters, as those latter people represent a risk to them. Sometimes those are colleagues. Each time Garrett is called out on his lack of qualifications [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img title="I" src="/IMG/Caps/i.png" alt="I" align="left" border="0" hspace="0" vspace="4" /> think there are many people in society that are imposters and very well know they are imposters. So what bothers them most are critics and people who expose that they&#8217;re imposters, as those latter people represent a risk to them. Sometimes those are colleagues.</p>
<p>Each time <a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/08/06/Texts_of_the_Claims_From_Balabhadra_Alex_Graveley_and_Matthew_J.shtml">Garrett</a> is called out on his lack of qualifications in security he&#8217;d post some circle-jerking self-praise and buzzword-dropping in social control media. To be clear, asserting that work on ACPI trains you at security like insisting that writing a CS thesis trains you to be a good physician.</p>
<p>The skills of physicians are very different. They need not write theses. Diagnosis is very important.</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s worse,&#8221; a friend has told me, as &#8220;the &#8220;security&#8221; degrees in the EU, even the PhD theses which I have seen, don&#8217;t cite any of the recognised, foundational articles or authors. It&#8217;s all a circle jerk of bullshit.  But Microsoft likes it that way.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/03/11/An_American_War_on_GNU_Linux_Software_Freedom_and_British_Inves.shtml">Nowadays they call back doors &#8220;security&#8221;</a>. <a href="https://cybershow.uk/content/blog/rossfest/rossfest.html">Real security experts get marginalised</a>.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t claim to be what you are not. It won&#8217;t end well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/23/i-never-claimed-to-be-a-medical-doctor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nearly End of &#8220;Meteorological Summer&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/20/nearly-end-of-meteorological-summer/</link>
		<comments>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/20/nearly-end-of-meteorological-summer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 07:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Schestowitz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/?p=8973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Days continue to lengthen from equinox to solstice and summer days progressively shorten after the solstice, so meteorological summer encompasses the build-up to the longest day and a diminishing thereafter, with summer having many more hours of daylight than spring.&#8221; ianne&#8217;s birthday is 4 days away (ahead) and we plan to go travel to be [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8220;Days continue to lengthen from equinox to solstice and summer days progressively shorten after the solstice, so meteorological summer encompasses the build-up to the longest day and a diminishing thereafter, with summer having many more hours of daylight than spring.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><img title="R" src="/IMG/Caps/r.png" alt="R" align="left" border="0" hspace="0" vspace="4" />ianne&#8217;s birthday is 4 days away (ahead) and we plan to go travel to be merry. A week later it&#8217;s Bank Holiday, then it&#8217;s end of summer and end of our holiday <a href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/19/autumn-around-the-corner-already/">based on the &#8220;meteorological summer&#8221; definition</a>.</p>
<p>We won&#8217;t let inappropriate communications interfere with our holidays, we&#8217;re instead getting on with our lives while keeping productive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/20/nearly-end-of-meteorological-summer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
