t has gotten gloomy again, so the hopes of going to the park are deflated again and this likely means lots of original articles, instead. Tomorrow we’ll exchange cards and celebrate with Jim Beam 14 years of happiness and teamwork. I said more about that in another site [1, 2], envisioning we’ll be too busy to write about the anniversary tomorrow.

Today I checked the progress in the blog in terms of visitorship, as it was not regularly updated in the past two decades because in 2006 I focused on non-personal sites.

It’s sad to see how much junk traffic comes from totally useless bots (not even search engines’ spiders). So much has changed, not just because of LLM slop. It seems like many people choose walled gardens such as social control media and many young people never heard of RSS feeds.

This predates the slop frenzy and it’ll make the population poorly informed, exposed to state-connected propaganda, and unfit to handle social life.

here are LOTS of Microsoft layoffs right now. Insiders know it, but they cannot speak about it (too risky). Media does not report these. It’ll conveniently – in an arse-covering fashion – dismiss that as “rumours” and say, no WARN notices. But Microsoft bypasses the law. It says, “we’ll fire you unless you agree to this ‘voluntary exit’ agreement, then sign an NDA to keep quiet and outwardly happy about it.”

Same for PIPs and LITE.

IBM and Microsoft have TENS OF THOUSANDS of layoffs this year. Unlike Oracle, they hide these.

Below are articles from 2026:

recently remembered that next month it is Wikileaks’ 20-year anniversary – one month before Techrights’.

Techrights is not a site anymore. Techrights is many things, including a community. The community is probably as old as its IRC presence, i.e. it goes back to 2008.

The Cyber Show (cybershow.uk) has been very active in techrights.org IRC (irc.techrights.org) lately and we forge alliances with groups whose missions overlap ours.

2 days ago: Ebay Uses Bots (Slop) to Give Users a Lot of Work

This has impacted many people, and one of them wrote:

Following on from my last post. Yesterday, I received a message
from Ebay with apparantly-good news:

Thanks again for reporting the listing(s) you found. We wanted to
let you know that we closed your report for the below referenced
listing(s). These listings have not been removed.

[With the listing I'd appealed the removal of listed below]

Well it’s a bit weird, my “appeal” has become a “report”, which
makes it sound like I’d reported myself for a voilation in the
first place. But I’m getting used to really weird uses of English
these days so the final statement “These listings have not been
removed” sounded good enough.

Only it was wrong! If I go to the listing link, it still returns
their 404 page “We looked everywhere!”, and when logged in it still
shows as being hidden as a “listing with issues”, with the option
to “appeal” still greyed out since my first appeal/”report”.

So it seems I’ve got the old beaurocratic “Bugger off!” after only
my first complaint to them. Yet they’re preventing themselves from
making ~$40 in fees if they’d just let the transaction go ahead on
Ebay, when I never suggested anything different anyway. It’s
basically costing them $40 just to piss me off for no reason.

But the message does at least admit to coming from the kind of
intellect I suspected was behind this complete insanity:

This determination was made using automation or artificial
intelligence.

I have an image in my mind now of going to Ebay HQ in the USA just
to find all the doors locked, and peeking through the dusty windows
to see endless rows of abandoned office cubicles, the only life
being the lights flashing from long rows of server racks hastily
installed in the corner of the room. Of course it’s probably really
all in some anonymous datacentre, costing a fortune for a net
result that’s barely distinguishable from cats walking over the old
human staff’s keyboards. Meanwhile their main competitor, Amazon
(which I refuse to even buy things from), is one of the companies
actually running such datacentres and selling AI.

Of course like Ebay’s old human staff, the AI still won’t let
anyone talk back.

Please don’t reply to this message. It was sent from an address
that doesn’t accept incoming email.

I’ve got to wonder how AI still took six days to respond to my
appeal though. Is it really now not even any faster than an
office full of over-worked humans, or just trying too hard to
emulate them?

Anyway the case with the keyboard seems settled, albeit
senselessly. Unless the buyer does contact me directly by email
before the end of the week I think I’ll give up and use it myself.
Mind you the way things are looking with all this devolving
technology and political/economic instability I’m increasingly
tempted to make the most of society while it still functions and go
off on a long break, driving around rural Australia spending my
money before it all becomes worthless in the aftermath of the
impending societal breakdown. But that’s probably an overreaction.

– The Free Thinker

N the past 2+ decades I did not lose data. Prior to that I only lost things I did not value, like old and mostly meaningless E-mails from the 1990s (not MP3s, I had those backed up). I make regular backups, I keep a spare machine in case the main one fails, and I maintain the hardware to make sure it works or be fully aware when it is about to fail. When my storage device finally failed in January 2023, for example, I had already prepared for it for about 12 months because there were warning signs. I no longer stored on it anything essential. Likewise, in 2020, I moved away from “ted” when it was giving some warnings, so when “ted” (used by me since 2013) finally died nothing of value was lost and no time wasted. I also keep external backups and we have fire extinguishing kits just in case.

People who have been around in tech for a long time and properly understand tech prepare for disasters in advance. So they don’t become disasters at all, they just involve a bit of work (to get fully back to speed).

am hardly shocked that more and more people: 1) hate slop; 2) recognise slop does not work as advertised (media hype and FOMO); 3) know it’s just a bubble, a passing fad.

This is just the beginning, they’ll try to re-inflate this bubble, but it’ll be costly (more debt).

t is arguably bizarre that some of the more/most computer-literate people are trying hardest to avoid computers where those computers objectively introduce risk.

In the case of banks, I still receive statements in the post, I never use a bank’s “app” (I don’t have a “smart” “phone”) and when something important needs to get done, I’ll quite likely go to a local branch of the bank.

Before computer ownership and Internet connection was simply assumed (now the same for “smart” “phones”) banks provided actual services and were held responsible for mistakes they made.

So we’ve lost something.

oday in the evening (or earlier tonight) I was typing up a rather long article in Techrights, where I am the main editor.

As usual, what typically happens is, strands (or trains) of thoughts quickly become streams of words, and words add up to sentences, paragraphs, then a draft of an article. Then I go through the article, which tends to be coherent as it was typed in one go (after planning, having had some time to condition myself to put together a topic to write about in the ‘correct’ sequence), I correct typos, improve the wordings, add some more links etc. (where suitable and readily available)

I do this on a remote laptop connected over the LAN with Barrier, so if there’s a network glitch it can result in lost keystrokes and long repeated keystrokes.

Not for the first time, the latter happened when I pressed “undo” (ctrl+z), so it began undoing things I edited, in effect deleting amendments made for several minutes (far worse than when it happens with backspace as the cursor goes all over the place). Typically I’d be “hands-off” when that happens, then re-do what was omitted. This time, however, two things went wrong: 1) I did not keep “hands-off”, not long enough anyway; so I could not re-do all the way. 2) I did not press ctrl+s (save) for quite some time, so reverting back to the file on disk wasn’t a possibility either. I tried, I even did so from another laptop.

Shit!

I lost some work.

On the bright side: 1) I remembered more or less 80% or more of the changes that I made and could reconstruct a lot (with slight variation, imperfect replication, maybe even better the second time around). 2) not much was lost (either words or time). 3) it was only the editing/correcting pass, not the writing pass. 4) there was a lesson or wake-up call here. I should take advantage of it.

I will probably still take the risk of writing over Barrier, but I need to save to disk more often and be vastly more prudent/careful when undoing gets ‘jammed’. There should be a way to re-do (ctrl+shift+z) everything and, failing that, there’s a file on disk that maintains a recent copy, not what’s on the screen/buffer.

My editing skills typically use past experience (incidents) to reduce chance of loss/error, so my wife was surprised that it happened to me. Writing this blog post probably takes a lot more time than the time the incident ‘cost’ me.

I wonder if other people can relate to this.

I’ve had a lot of time to think about this (over an hour already), so documenting to myself – and maybe to others too -what happened can be hopefully prove useful.

There is no perfect (error-proof) way to edit text, but there are ways to reduce the risk and the cost of mistakes/crashes.

think Rianne and I share the feeling that many companies (not just GAFAM) hide their true debt, fire people in secret, and basically bluff their way in this increasingly fake economy where “everyone is doing it!” (Cheating)

We spoke about this with Rianne’s parents today. It’s too easy to be critical of the likes of Amazon, IBM, and Google. Rianne brought up Microsoft as well.

It seems like legal action is heading IBM’s way now.

“If you have any questions at all,” one organiser told me ahead of the first such talk since 2018. “please don’t hesitate to reach out. We have several questions prepared for RMS during the Q&A, and if there’s anything you’d like us to raise as well, I’d be more than happy to include it!”

At the time I was too busy dealing with bullies.

To the host, Georgia Tech, there was a political burden. Quoting the organiser (definitely not a Cheeto fan): “P.S. I also really love that y’all hate on our Grand Cheeto Master. I know you’ve mentioned not being fond of air travel on your blog, which I completely understand – but if you ever find yourselves visiting the South, we would be more than happy to host you here at Georgia Tech for a session! Until then, we look forward to continued collaboration with y’all remotely – and, of course, welcoming the “devil” down to Georgia soon…”

“Thank you again for your time and support.”

I was not too far from Georgia on my last trip to the US, but that was 20 years ago and I don’t plan to come to the US again (not any time soon).

I hope RMS will visit the UK some time soon and preferably not too far from here (he was in Oxford).