<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>schestowitz.com &#187; XML</title>
	<atom:link href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/category/xml/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog</link>
	<description>Reflections on Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2026 16:47:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.40</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Internet Dinosaurs</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2006/11/19/larry-king-dinosaurs/</link>
		<comments>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2006/11/19/larry-king-dinosaurs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 14:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Schestowitz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XML]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2006/11/19/larry-king-dinosaurs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Has Larry King ever used the Internet?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center">
<img src="/IMG/blog/rabbit.jpg" alt="Rabbit" /><br />
<em><font color="#555555">Evolve or perish</font></em>
</p>
<p><img src="/IMG/Caps/i.png" border="0" align="left" hspace="0" vspace="4" alt="I" /><b> love the Larry King show</b>. I really do, I swear! I no longer get around to watching Larry King Live, but I have truly admired the guy for his eloquence and knowledge&#8230; until now. <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2006/11/15/larry-king-internet/" title="Larry King Admits Heâ€™s Never Used The Internet: â€˜Do You Punch Little Buttons and Things?">Have a look at the reason</a>. While some people lag behind when it comes to understanding the Web (HTML), IBM celebrates the <a href="http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/library/x-think38.html?ca=dgr-lnxw01XMLDecade" title="Thinking XML: The XML decade">tenth anniversary of XML</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2006/11/19/larry-king-dinosaurs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RSS Alternatives and Feeds Overload</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2006/08/06/feeds-overload/</link>
		<comments>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2006/08/06/feeds-overload/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 06:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Schestowitz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyberspace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XML]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2006/08/06/feeds-overload/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How to do it better and the dangers of going overboard]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="center">
<a href="http://www.rssowl.org/" title="RSSOwl" style="border: none"><img src="/IMG/blog/rssowl.jpg" border="0" alt="RSSOwl Logo" /></a>
</div>
<p><img src="/IMG/Caps/f.png" border="0" align="left" hspace="0" vspace="4" alt="F" /><b>EEDS have improved the lives of everyone who wishes to be &#8216;on top of things&#8217;</b>. But what tools should ideally be used? For syndication, I continue to use RSSOwl, as opposed to <a href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2006/06/11/bloated-apps/" title="Bloated Applications Deter Some Users">more bloated</a> alternatives such as recent versions of Mozilla Thunderbird. I partly helped in the testing of RSSOwl (as a gensture of reciprocity), so I still feel as though I must &#8216;eat my own dog food&#8217;. And yet &#8212; recently had to check some other <a href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2006/07/29/web-based-aggregator/" title="Local-Yet-Web-based Feeds Aggregators">feed readers that are Web-based</a> (or a carefully-crafted script that outputs (X)HTML). I was interested in better tools whose development is more active. The same applies to newsgroup readers. Some describe themselves as &#8216;application whores&#8217; in such contexts.</p>
<p>Over the years I developed this banal habit of reading feeds. At present, I read the news three times a day (i.e. three passes), but other feeds &#8212; those which I once followed closely &#8212; I only go past or glance at about twice a week. Desire has been lost for full RSS coverage. Mailing lists and newsgroups likewise. Often I just quickly look through the titles/subject lines. It&#8217;s probably due to excessive subscription and burdensome load that I can no longer cope with. But there is no sense of obligation anymore. I suppose many people reach the state of feed overload, which is closely-related (if not an alias for) <a href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2006/03/08/information-overload/" title="Article on Information Overload">&#8216;information overload&#8217;</a>. Such overloads take over innocent cyberspacers.</p>
<p><b>Side-anecdote</b>: In hindsight, the last sentence if a bit of an overstatements or maybe a gross generalisation (projecting one&#8217;s problems onto others). But this generalisation is probably a benign one that acts merely as a warning sign. Unlike, for instance, calling someone a murder for taking antibiotics and killing germs&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2006/08/06/feeds-overload/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Local-Yet-Web-based Feeds Aggregators</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2006/07/29/web-based-aggregator/</link>
		<comments>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2006/07/29/web-based-aggregator/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2006 07:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Schestowitz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AJAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XML]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2006/07/29/web-based-aggregator/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My unfruitful search for a Web-based alternative]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center">
<img src="/IMG/blog/feedlounge.gif" alt="Feedlounge" /><br />
<br />
<em><font color="#555555">Feedlounge Web-based reader (a third-party paid-for service)</font></em>
</p>
<p><img src="/IMG/Caps/a.png" border="0" align="left" hspace="0" vspace="4" alt="A" /><b> week ago I was trying to find an alternative Web-based feed-reading software</b>. I was looking for merely anything, apart from desktop-bound solutions or <a href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2005/06/30/remote-data/" title="Remote Data">&#8216;<em>offshorn</em>&#8216;</a> Web-based services such as Feedlounge and Google Reader. While I am very happy with my current feeds reader, <a href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2004/12/31/rssowl/" title="RSSOwl">RSSOwl</a>, it is bound to remain a native desktop application (albeit it&#8217;s fully cross-platform). I rarely bother to tunnel in and check the feeds while on vacation, so I quickly go &#8216;out of sync&#8217;. A Web-based aggregator could address this deficiency.</p>
<p>I had a quick browse through <code>sourceforge.net</code>, but could not find anything that was complete. Then, I took a glance at <code>freshmeat.net</code> where more complete projects reside. Here is a short report on what I could and could not locate.</p>
<ul>
<li>A CGI-based feed reader: <a href="http://freshmeat.net/projects/cgifeed/" title="CGIFeed">CGIFeed</a>;</li>
<li>PHP-based: <a href="http://freshmeat.net/projects/zfeeder/" title="zFeeder">zFeeder</a></li>
</ul>
<p>None was too impressive (more akin to a complete miss). I was then reminded of an RSS feed reader (aggregator) which already <a href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2006/02/26/aggregate-feeds/" title="Aggregating Feeds">integrates news on my Website</a> although it is extremely rudimentary. In general, none of the applications that I shallowly reviewed (judging by lists and screenshots, without installing) was mature or complete in terms of the required features. The pursuit for a free, Free (as in &#8220;Freedom to change, redistribute and so forth&#8221;), Web-based, multi-functional software was probably too much. This came to prove that, in terms of functionality (let alone responsiveness that is another important matter), Web-based applications have a lot of catching up to do <abbr title="With Respect to">w.r.t.</abbr>  good ol&#8217; desktop programs.</p>
<p>For completeness, I also found:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://freshmeat.net/projects/nntp2rss/" title="nntp2rss">nntp2rss</a> &#8211; A tool that provides a bridge to access newsgroups using an RSS reader. Quite interesting, I thought.</li>
<li><a href="http://freshmeat.net/projects/flock/" title="Flock">Flock</a> &#8211; still in alpha stage and has not been updated for almost 4 years. It is not to be confused with the Web browser Flock (a <a href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2005/10/21/firefox-fork/" title=" Firefox Fork">Mozilla Firefox derivative</a> with social networks slant).
</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2006/07/29/web-based-aggregator/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Assessment of Competition in Search Results</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2006/05/11/competition-in-search/</link>
		<comments>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2006/05/11/competition-in-search/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 13:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Schestowitz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web-based]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XML]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2006/05/11/competition-in-search/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Checking search engine positions with automated scripts]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- mutate, then post --></p>
<p align="center">
<img src="/IMG/blog/google-computer.jpg" alt="Google on a computer screen"/>
</p>
<p><b>Would you like to make search engine tracking more efficient?</b> If so, read on.</p>
<p><img src="/IMG/Caps/a.png" border="0" align="left" hspace="0" vspace="4" alt="A" />MOMG some nice Web-based tools for <abbr title="Search Engine Optimisation">SEO</abbr>, there exists a <a href="http://www.tippy.co.uk/page-rank-compare/" title="Google Page Rank Comparison Tool">Google PageRank comparison tool</a>. There are more such tools on the same site. They tend to automate probings that are intended for egocentric evaluations of site positions.</p>
<p>It is definitely worth a try if you are a Webmaster who seeks more attention (referrals) from search engines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2006/05/11/competition-in-search/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review of Web-Based Feed Readers</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2006/04/01/feeds-review/</link>
		<comments>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2006/04/01/feeds-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2006 18:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Schestowitz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web-based]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XML]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2006/04/01/feeds-review/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent take on on-line feed readers]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="center">
<img src="/IMG/blog/feedlounge.gif" alt="Feedlounge" />
</div>
<p><a href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2005/10/08/feed-readers-everywhere/" title="Feed Readers Everywhere">Feed readers are merely everywhere nowadays</a>. They are especially popular among bloggers and sufferers of the <a href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2006/03/08/information-overload/" title="Article on Information Overload">information overload age</a>. To some, feed readers have become an application whose importance is on par with that of the E-mail client and the Web browser.</p>
<p>In a new <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/30/the-state-of-online-feed-readers/" title="The State of Online Feed Readers">review of  on-line feed readers</a> (as opposed to native desktop applications) <a href="http://feedlounge.com" title="Feedlounge">Feedlounge</a>, <a href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2005/06/20/feedlounge-alpha/" title="Feedlounge Alpha">which I am/was somewhat involved in</a>, was probably one among two winners, Google being the other contender. I once mentioned Google as the <a href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2005/11/01/google-iuron/" title="Google Print and AI">primarily threat to Feedlounge</a> &#8212; a fact that Feedlounge founder were quick to grasp. Will all readers prevail or will only a few survive?</p>
<p><b>Other reviews</b>: <a href="http://www.linuxforums.org/reviews/overview_of_the_ten_major_linux_distributions.html" title=" Overview of the ten major Linux distributions">A decent overview involving 10 prominent Linux distributions</a>, even <a href="http://distrowatch.com/dwres.php?resource=review-winvista" title="Review of Windows Vista">a comical review of Windows Vista</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2006/04/01/feeds-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Bookmarks on Your Own Site</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2006/03/05/local-social-bookmarks/</link>
		<comments>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2006/03/05/local-social-bookmarks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 17:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Schestowitz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AJAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web-based]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XML]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2006/03/05/local-social-bookmarks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Creating a del.icio.us clone on your own Web site]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center">
<img src="/IMG/blog/delicious.jpg" alt="del.icio.us"  title="Picture without copying restrictions" /><br />
<em><font color="#555555">My old <code>del.icio.us</code> bookmark</font> </em>
</p>
<p><img src="/IMG/Caps/i.png" border="0" align="left" hspace="0" vspace="4" alt="I" /><b> previously mentioned <code>del.icio.us</code>, back in the days when it was a fairly new and hot phenomenon</b>. The context and points of focus were <a href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2005/05/28/delicious-bookmarks/" title="Del.icio.us Import and Export">ways of escaping it (exporting)</a>, along with all the acquired data, which had of course been put on a third party. I mentioned the <a href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2005/06/30/remote-data/" title="Remote Data">dangers of &#8216;offshoring&#8217; data</a> once in the past; quite explicitly and bluntly so as a matter of fact.</p>
<p>Matters can be simplified however, assuming you have systems administration skills. There is a polished new tool called <a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/scuttle/" title="Scuttle">Scuttle</a>, which enables any Webmaster to set up his/her little, super-flexible and highly-functional <code>del.icio.us</code> clone (social boomarks with bookmarklets to be precise) on a personal site. The software requires PHP support from the Web server and it can use MySQL, among many other database types. <a href="http://www.schestowitz.com/Bookmarks/social_bookmark/" title="Schestowitz.com - Links">Here is an installation of mine</a>. It is less than a day old, so it is naturally immature and somewhat depleted. Feel free to join in and add your bookmarks to this pool. The installation is here to stay and my site is registerted until 2014.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2006/03/05/local-social-bookmarks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
