<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>schestowitz.com &#187; Opinion</title>
	<atom:link href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/tag/opinion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog</link>
	<description>Reflections on Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2026 16:47:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.40</generator>
	<item>
		<title>How I View Research</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2009/02/04/how-i-view-research/</link>
		<comments>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2009/02/04/how-i-view-research/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Schestowitz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pr]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://schestowitz.com/Weblog/?p=1552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Y intent is never to promote anything. I just try to find facts that are usually separate from consensus, which is very typically distorted, e.g. in politics (&#8220;war on terror&#8221;). Some people are concerned about facts because we are all very skilled at beautifying our own integrity. The reporter who is selected to cover for [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="/IMG/Caps/m.png" border="0" align="left" hspace="0" vspace="4" alt="M" />Y intent is never to promote anything. I just try to find facts that are usually separate from consensus, which is very typically distorted, e.g. in politics (&#8220;war on terror&#8221;).</p>
<p>Some people are concerned about facts because we are all very skilled at beautifying our own integrity. The reporter who is selected to cover for a publication based on inclinations, convictions or obedience, for example, is often sufficiently indoctrinated so as to actually believe his/her writings, say X, about Y (well, &#8220;everyone else is writing X about Y too&#8221;). It&#8217;s a cyclic trap, it&#8217;s sheep/cattle effect. It&#8217;s a self-fulfilling prophecy in a sense. We see it in Comes exhibits (e.g. <a href="http://boycottnovell.com/2009/01/19/gartner-corrupted-by-microsoft/">&#8220;The NC is dead&#8221; roadshow</a>) and the Gartner Group was openly accused of doing the same thing to set standards.</p>
<p>Only by challenging conventions with facts can we find truth, then present it and preach to defend it (<a href="http://www.prwatch.org/" title="PR Watch">money always fights against truth</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2009/02/04/how-i-view-research/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
