Association, I meant...
----- Original Message -----
>From: Roy Schestowitz <roy@schestowitz.com>
To: <harveyt@prodigy.net>
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 10:46 PM
Subject: Re: According to this, spelling doesn't matter
> This is amazing. I knew people visualise words, but not that their outer
> 'wrapping' and length related to assocciation.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Harvey Tobkes
> To: Roy Schestowitz
> Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 8:53 PM
> Subject: According to this, spelling doesn't matter
>
>
>
> I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aculalty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdgnieg The
> phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde
> Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer inwaht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the
> olny
> iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae.
> The rset
> can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is
> bcuseae
> the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a
> wlohe.
> Amzanig huh? Yaeh and I awlyas thought slpeling was ipmorantt!
>
> Note, my Word Spell Checker just had a nervous breakdown.
>
>
>
|
|
