Thanks for your response Roy! I thought I was losing my sanity.
"Roy Schestowitz" <newsgroups@schestowitz.com> wrote in message
cqtied$2u2q$1@godfrey.mcc.ac.uk">news:cqtied$2u2q$1@godfrey.mcc.ac.uk...
> curiousD wrote:
>
> > I got into a debate about "natural" muscle definition with a friend of
> > mine and he admantly states that some people are born muscular ...
>
> There are genetic tendencies, but diet and exercise are dominant factors.
>
> > ... some people are born with an arnold schwanegger's(i don't know how
to
> > spell his last name) body without working out.
>
> Arnold Schwarzenegger is (or was) on steroids. Plain and simple.
>
> > He states that weight training with or without steroids is not a natural
> > muscle definition development.
>
> If natural means born, innate, then no. Weight training affects definition
> though so I'd say the statement is wrong.
>
> > I told him that some people's body may have a tendency to get defined a
> > lot quicker because they use those muscles and in consequence, those
> > muscles get bigger and defined.
> > Has there anyone ever been born muscular????
>
> Your point is correctly made, no doubt.
>
> Roy
>
> --
> Roy Schestowitz
> http://schestowitz.com
|
|
