Big Bill wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Apr 2005 14:08:46 +0100, Roy Schestowitz
> <newsgroups@schestowitz.com> wrote:
>
>>Paul Burke wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 03 Apr 2005 03:30:20 +0100, Roy Schestowitz
>>> <newsgroups@schestowitz.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Paul Burke wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all
>>>>> Can some of you please check what the PR is for this page.
>>>>> http://www.whitefacet.com/
>>>>>
>>>>> I am getting PR2, and the owner is getting PR3
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm just trying to find out which is correct
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you all
>>>>> plh
>>>>> Paul
>>>>
>>>>I am seeing PR3 over here, but I am using the Mozilla Google bar. I
>>>>don't think this should make a difference though. It uses the same API
>>>>and the same sources of information. Have you made sure you are at the
>>>>very root of the site. Close and re-open your browser and see if that
>>>>makes a difference. Sometimes the PR indicator goes wild and re-opening
>>>>of a tab causes change.
>>>>
>>>>Roy
>>>
>>> Hi Roy
>>> I was just looking at your site. It looks nice and clean :)
>>> I did notice that you have you css in the code rather than a css file,
>>> and your page doesn't validate
>>> http://www.htmlhelp.com/cgi-bin/validate.cgi?url=http%3A%2F....
>>> HTH
>>>
>>> Take care
>>> plh
>>> Paul
>>
>>Thanks Paul. I appreciate your opinion very much.
>>
>>When validating, I never turned to anything else but w3.org; that's the
>>one I point to from my pages. There are other stricter validators like
>>508, but one validators to wrestle with is enough for me. *smile*
>
> What's 508?
>
> BB looking for a new stick to beat himself with.
It is the animal that will eat up your hours of drinking at the pub and have
you beat up the monitor time after time (of validating).
http://www.contentquality.com/
--
Roy S. Schestowitz
http://Schestowitz.com
|
|
