Harold wrote:
> <woodcock@SonLightSoftware.com> wrote in message
> news:1123560545.782227.9330@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>> My fork is legally independant of GPL and the GPL stream. Doesn't
>> anybody bother to do a Google search or read FAQs any more?
>>
> A fork *cannot* be legally independent of the licence. Read the licence.
> In particular, sections 1 and 2 which, being near the beginning, are hard
> to miss.
>
> For example, section 2b:
> ======= begin quote ====
> b) You must cause any work that you distribute or publish, that in
> whole or in part contains or is derived from the Program or any
> part thereof, to be licensed as a whole at no charge to all third
> parties under the terms of this License.
> ======= end quote =====
I asked the developer about GPL contradictions in the past and was pointed
to:
http://www.palmyanoff.com/manual.htm#thedeal
Roy
|
|
