Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: How you can remove articles from GoogleGroups' archive

  • Subject: Re: How you can remove articles from GoogleGroups' archive
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 16:41:46 +0000
  • Newsgroups: alt.internet.search-engines
  • Organization: schestowitz.com / MCC / Manchester University
  • References: <1133476099.924793.134420@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <jv0vo11l5gi6059k30u9a0f1tq6t0vrsv5@4ax.com> <1133541630.651687.50860@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <ld91p1hqkkj59i9tj1r0s5i5k30mphf3kj@4ax.com> <1133556695.557589.263170@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <7bq1p1lm4dv5mvoikr9i6kqc7f8j2plqsb@4ax.com> <op.s07bsgow26l578@borek> <dmsce0$i1t$1@godfrey.mcc.ac.uk> <phgnp1d58iupsh4979tvuv7oqtsmf7rth6@4ax.com> <dngme9$1hch$1@godfrey.mcc.ac.uk> <s9aop1dabovt2gevlocvnrgjs4uje7e9hf@4ax.com>
  • Reply-to: newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: KNode/0.7.2
__/ [David] on Sunday 11 December 2005 13:48 \__

> On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 08:04:44 +0000, Roy Schestowitz
> <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>>> Roy Schestowitz will you ever backup the statement that I've "been
>>> proven in the past to be a pathological liar"?
>>> 
>>> If not you are nothing more than a liar yourself Roy Schestowitz.
>>> 
>>> BTW I don't care what anyone finds about me on Usenet or anywhere else
>>> as long as it's true and one thing I don't do is lie. If you or anyone
>>> else want to show I'm liar feel free (note: Bill is not a reliable
>>> source of information about me :-).
>>
>>He is to me. Let's just put it behind, Dave. It's not worth having any
>>tention in newsgroup. We could both use the break.
>>
>>Kind regards and merry Christmas...
> 
> I couldn't agree with you more Roy, so why not put and end to this the
> only two ways I'll be happy with.
> 
> 1. Back up your statement I've "been proven in the past to be a
> pathological liar". Examples with specific dates would be nice.
> 
> or
> 
> 2. Retract the statement as groundless and apologise.


Option 1: it's rather subtle. Apart from cases where you hid very signifi-
cant nuggets of information, you also tweaked the truth slightly for self-
-glorification. I thought this group was intended to help one another with
statements that deliver the truth in its entirety.

 
> If you truly believe the statement then show some conviction and back
> it up, if not retract it.
> 
> What's so unreasonable about the above, after all you bad mouthed me
> when I was trying to help you make more money from Adsense!!


Yes, I vaguely remember.


> BTW I thought you had me killfiled :-)


I never bother with filters in KNode. *smile*


> David


Roy

PS - Your choice for derogatory subject lines are a sign of immaturity. By
all  means, this shows you are a 'shark character', which wouldn't  appeal
to  clients.  Try to be more gentle on cyberspace and this  includes  good
'Net citizenship'. Splogs are a vile and unacceptable practice and we both
it.

Whether  I care about the subject lines is another matter. There are  less
flattering things about me on the Internet and they are not always slipped
off one's sleeve without any justification.

-- 
Roy S. Schestowitz      | HTML is for page layout, not for textual messages
http://Schestowitz.com  |    SuSE Linux     |     PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
  4:30pm  up  23:38,  18 users,  load average: 1.13, 0.90, 0.62
      http://iuron.com - next generation of search paradigms

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index