Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Wikipendia versus Encyclopaedia Britannica

  • Subject: Re: Wikipendia versus Encyclopaedia Britannica
  • From: "Luigi Donatello Asero" <jaggillarfotboll@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 17:23:14 GMT
  • Newsgroups: alt.internet.search-engines
  • Organization: Telia Internet
  • Xref: news.mcc.ac.uk alt.internet.search-engines:72930
"Roy Schestowitz" <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> skrev i meddelandet
news:dntogu$1fke$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> __/ [Luigi Donatello Asero] on Friday 16 December 2005 04:07 \__
>
> > Hello,
> > I found an interesting comparative analysis between Wikipendia and the
> > Encyclopaedia
> > Britannica.
> > http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v438/n7070/full/438900a.html
> > What do you think about the analysis?
>
> Why crossposting to so many groups? I can only see 2 out of 5 which are in
> some way relevant?


Which ones are relevant  in your opinion and which ones are not and why?

> Why so many languages? I remember the days when you politely posted
questions
> to alt.html without making so much commotion.
>
> Regardless, have a look:
>
> http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/12/15/1352207&tid=95&tid=14


Thank you.
Did you have a look here?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4530930.stm

-- 
     Luigi Donatello Asero
https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/fi/italiassa/liguriassa/loma-asunto-riomaggioressa-makuuhuone-1.php














[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index