Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Wikipendia versus Encyclopaedia Britannica

__/ [wideangle@xxxxxxxxx] on Saturday 17 December 2005 06:05 \__

>> http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v438/n7070/full/438900a.html
>> What do you think about the analysis?
> 
> 
> "We're very pleased with the results and we're hoping it will focus
> people's attention on the overall level of our work, which is pretty
> good".
> 
> -- Jimmy Wales, Wikipedia founder
> 
> Wikipedia has a great future ahead. It just can't let down *so* much of
> people working for this great project. So many editors, more than
> 13,000 -- where on earth do you get them for? Encyclopaedia of
> Britannica?

Some idiots are already playing games to ruin the credibility status of
Wikipedia...

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/12/17/jimmy_wales_shot_dead_says_wikipedia/

Roy

-- 
Roy S. Schestowitz      |    "Did anyone see my lost carrier?"
http://Schestowitz.com  |    SuSE Linux     |     PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
  8:40am  up 6 days 15:48,  5 users,  load average: 0.89, 0.89, 0.89

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index