Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: duplicate pages

  • Subject: Re: duplicate pages
  • From: "Bobby" <nospam@nospam.com>
  • Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 10:05:33 GMT
  • Newsgroups: alt.internet.search-engines
  • Organization: TIN
  • References: <DAmDe.182821$75.7948880@news4.tin.it> <c44sd15e1mgu6ens7e8nqkbhpvg6qh08u5@4ax.com> <dblp13$50g$2@godfrey.mcc.ac.uk>
  • Xref: news.mcc.ac.uk alt.internet.search-engines:63783
Thanks guys,
but I wish there were a few other point of views....

"Roy Schestowitz" <newsgroups@schestowitz.com> ha scritto nel messaggio 
> Big Bill wrote:
>> On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 06:56:35 GMT, "Bobby" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
>>>I have a site of 120 pages. 10 of this are VERY similar becouse they are 
>>>description of similar products. Do you think that it could be dangerouse
>>>? Would I get penalized ?
>>>What do you recommend ? To us <meta name="robots"
>>>content="noindex,nofollow"> ?
>> No beause they'll ignore it anyway and what's the point in having
>> content if it can't be recognised by the engines?
>>>Please let me know
>> Re-write the pages. Get creative.
> Will the different yet similar pages be helpful to the _users_? Splitting 
> an
> existing product into separate chunks ('fragmenting') is often worse from 
> a
> user's point-of-view as it's deceiving.
> I don't think you will get penalised if the pages vary in content (word
> count) and the phrases vary (flow dissimilarity). Like Bill said, be
> creative and you will not need to exclude pages from the crawling cycle.
> You will also lodge in more SERP's although PR 'energy' will be spread
> among more pages, which will result in ranks declining.
> Roy
> -- 
> Roy S. Schestowitz
> http://Schestowitz.com 

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index