Robert Frost-Bridges wrote:
> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>> If you use Firefox (in which case the "after" gets picked up) or another
>> proper browser, go to Print Preview and see why I'm worried and having
>> second thoughts. I don't expect people to print pages though; it is a
>> "proof of concept" rather, which I hope the WordPress community will pick
>> up on.
> Surely Els suggestion fits best for a proof of concept then. I think you
> did acknowledge that as an excellent idea but the fact that 400+ pages
> would need updating, but if it's the right way then that's what you need
> to do, even if it is time consuming.
There are pitfalls to both approaches, I guess. With Els' solution, you
unnecessarily inflate the amount of code (no complaints, Els) and duplicate
elements. Changing one URL may then involve changing another.
Roy S. Schestowitz