Parish wrote:
>
> £200k according to this
> http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/cyber/archive/tw-477.html
>
> Going back to the article in The Register, I hope that Apple ultimately
> lose that battle because it conflicts with the case law (phones4u) cited
> in the article and Apple have a "branding scheme" of perpending 'i' to
> any word which potentially could be anything in the future.
>
> Parish
Interesting. I wonder what their stance is on the following:
http://www.griffintechnology.com/products/icurve/
Many companies already exploit that little 'i' to ascribe to it the quality
of Apple Corp.
Roy
--
Roy Schestowitz
http://schestowitz.com
|
|