Volker wrote:
>>> Why does google does not show a links for "link:www.smallsql.de"? There
>>> are pages with links to my site. I can find it if I search for for
>>> "smallsql".
>>
>> The Google link command only gives a selection of links, generally older
>> and higher PR links will be shown. It is not very useful.
>>
> Means this that links from pages with a PageRank of 0 have no value? What
> is the minimum PageRank to list as link?
Some people in this NG have spoken about PR4 as significant enough to be
definitely listed. However, I believe that I see links with PR1 or even PR0
listed on occasions. What David did not refer to is the refresh cycles of
Google. New backlinks only show up when PR is updated, every 3+ months or
so. The effects of links are immediate, but you will not be able to track
them immediately. PageRank likewise, I believe.
>> BTW your product looks nice but I notice it is only on version 0.01, how
>> well does it work.
>>
> What do you want to know exactly? It implements most of the JDBC 3.0 API
> now. The JDBC 4.0 API will be implements if the specification is available
> as beta.
> The follow are the major missings:
> 1.) Indexes: It is very complex Indexes, transactions, different isolation
> level and speed to realism together. I think 1 need 2 months for it.
> 2.) Many SQL functions. This is simple but cost some time. Currently I
> have only the functions that I need to port 2 applications. If there are a
> request from a tester I can add it very fast.
> 3.) Stored Procedure: Because there are no standard language I have no
> idea how it should work. The core idea is that existing application can
> port very easy without changing.
>
> Answer this your question?
>
> Volker
--
Roy S. Schestowitz
http://Schestowitz.com
|
|
