Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Miserable failure revisited

__/ [wd] on Saturday 29 October 2005 07:39 \__

> On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 02:59:35 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>> __/ [Mikkel Moldrup-Lakjer] on Friday 28 October 2005 16:55 \__
>>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>> Such as this one:
>>>> Controlling information directly or indirectly is a burden and Google
>>>> will have to find a way to serve people's requirement for information
>>>> without being portrayed as evil. It'll get worse, I promise you...
>>> Hey, I was just writing about how Google has chosen to defend its
>>> patented PageRank technology instead of making tweaks but then I saw
>>> that they /have/ made a modification to the SERP for 'miserable
>>> failure'. Try it!
>> I wonder how many SERP's will be modified in this way. I guess Google and
>> politics don't mix too well.
> Did you click on Moore's link?  If your referrer is
> Google-miserable-failure, you get redirected to a /miserable directory.
> Turn your referrer logging off with the web developer toolbar and see the
> difference.

I guess that the White House is unlikely to adopt such practices...


Roy S. Schestowitz      | "I feed my 3 penguins with electricity and love"
http://Schestowitz.com  |    SuSE Linux     |     PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
  7:55am  up 64 days 15:30,  5 users,  load average: 0.28, 0.37, 0.38
      http://iuron.com - next generation of search paradigms

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index