Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Pirillo: Internet Explorer 7 UI Will Suck

  • Subject: Re: Pirillo: Internet Explorer 7 UI Will Suck
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 08:32:43 +0100
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: schestowitz.com / MCC / Manchester University
  • References: <1275887.k778hHQfh6@schestowitz.com> <4aru8oFuqhe4U1@individual.net> <4oe3i3-a9d.ln1@ellandroad.demon.co.uk>
  • Reply-to: newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: KNode/0.7.2
__/ [ Mark Kent ] on Wednesday 26 April 2006 06:57 \__

> begin  oe_protect.scr
> B Gruff <bbgruff@xxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>> On Friday 21 April 2006 12:15 Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>> "My guess is that when IE7 goes gold, more people will be driven to start
>>> using Firefox"
>>>         http://chris.pirillo.com/blog/_archives/2006/4/10/1875069.html
>> I really can't comment on IE7, not having tried it.  However, I do get the
>> impression that there are signs of MS "reforming" to some extent.  By
>> that, I mean that various articles which I have read seem to imply that
>> that IE7 will "break" a good many web sites, in that sites which were
>> written to "exploit" IE's foibles (thereby making them "IE only" sites)
>> will break, and need to be modified to make them "standard" as it were.
> I find it hard to believe that Microsoft will do this.  I suspect that
> they'll continue to support the non-standard aspects of IE in some way.
>> Is there any truth in this?
>> If so, to my mind IE7 will be A Very Good Thing indeed.  In itself it
>> would not necessarily promote Firefox or any other browser, but it would
>> level the playing field and remove what is for all practical purposes
>> "vendor
>> lock-in" in the browser market.  Sure, IE will still be bundled with
>> Windows (but so is Firefox here - by Dell!), but the equivalent of
>> "proprietary formats" would be removed, would it not?
> Indeed t'would be a good thing!  Though not a likely one, I think.  The
> only reason I can imagine why MS would go this way, though, is if they
> see a lock-in opportunity somewhere else, and/or don't see the browser
> as important any more.
> That said, with Apache running something like 70% of internet sites
> (although perhaps 90% of active sites, as Microsoft persuade registrars
> to park unused sites on Windows 2003), and Firefox as something like 20%
> and growing, the web is moving rapidly to open standards and open
> source.  W3Schools put firefox at 25% for 2006, with up to almost 40% in
> Finland and Germany.

,----[ Quote ]
| The obvious question is, did Microsoft pay Go Daddy or offer any incentive
| to move its parked domains to Windows? Adelman declined to clear up
| that issue one way or the other. "We can't discuss the technical aspects of
| our industry relationships."


Re. Firefox usage:

http://www.xitimonitor.com/etudes/equipement13.asp (in French)

> Whilst the man in the street hasn't recognised the lock-in risk, many
> CIOs and CTOs have, so I do not think that MS could get away with a
> direct and overt lock-in play.  I expect that Windows Vista will have
> some more subtle lock-in methods waiting to entrap the unwary.

For completeness:

,----[ Quote ]
| He (Todd) highlighted Vista's integrated Internet search, digital rights
| management and software that would create fixed document formats
| comparable to Adobe's pdf.


> Ah well, if you want to avoid such lock-in, then use Linux!

Preferably a community-driven distribution as well.

Best wishes,


Roy S. Schestowitz      | "Computers are useless. They only solve problems"
http://Schestowitz.com  |    SuSE Linux    ¦     PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
  8:25am  up 3 days 17:36,  10 users,  load average: 0.57, 0.47, 0.53
      http://iuron.com - next generation of search paradigms

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index