On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 19:36:41 +0200, Hadron Quark wrote:
> Stuart Krivis <jd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 13:14:05 -0500, Linonut <linonut@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>After takin' a swig o' grog, Hadron Quark belched out this bit o' wisdom:
>>>
>>>> Handover Phist <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> Hadron Quark :
>>>>>> B Gruff <bbgruff@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dunno whether Roy has already posted this one - I can't keep up with
>>>>>>> him!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And you are one who supports his spamming of the newsgroup with
>>>>>> *multiple posts* when a single post would suffice. Imagine what its like
>>>>>> for others.
>>>>>
>>>>> I support him too. Please filter him if you dont like his posts.
>>>>
>>>> I have. But tell me, whats wrong with ONE post with all the links?
>>>>
>>>> Do spammers spam the political NGs with *every* link to every article
>>>> from CNN or the BBC? No. Its bollx to do so: thats why. We can find out
>>>> OWN linux links from the same places he does - slashdot and dedicated
>>>> linux online magazines and forums. a NG is not a repository for web
>>>> links.
>>>
>>>Who appointed you newsgroup moderator?
>>
>> I think Funkenbutch did.
>>
>
> Asking someone to summarise 300 posts is hardly net nannying or
> attempting to be the "moderator".
>
> But answer the question : would a political NG put up with someone
> posting links to every cnn and bbc article about politics?
>
> Answer is clear : no.
That's irrelevant, since this is COLA.
--
Kier
|
|
