__/ [ Hadron Quark ] on Wednesday 16 August 2006 22:05 \__
> 7 <website_has_email@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Hadron Quark wrote:
>>
>>> 7 <website_has_email@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>
>>>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Google talks up smart software for reliability
>>>>>
>>>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>>>> | However, Pike did say that nowadays Google's servers are
>>>>> | custom-designed and run Red Hat Linux with a modified kernel.
>>>>> |
>>>>> | [...]
>>>>> |
>>>>> | Pike said he doesn't believe Google could have achieved this level of
>>>>> | reliability with Windows.
>>>>> |
>>>>> | "It was a good decision [to choose Linux] because it made it so
>>>>> | flexible in the way you can do it," he said.
>>>>> |
>>>>> | [...]
>>>>> |
>>>>> | Pike then jokingly said if Microsoft's claims about the number of
>>>>> | Windows administrators required per server were true compared to
>>>>> | Linux, "Google would be a much bigger company".
>>>>> `----
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.linuxworld.com.au/index.php/id;1225434946;fp;2;fpid;1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If Google invalidated micoshaft sys admin studies, then there
>>>> is no reason for ANY small, medium or large sized businesses,
>>>> educational establishments, charities and governments to
>>>> believe micoshaft funded studies ever again.
>>>
>>> Who or what is "micoshaft"? Some kind of census company?
>>
>>
>> Oh nah. Its some kind of employer of asstroturfing
>> trolls who try to pass themselves off here as windope users
>> when in fact they are actually illiterate cut and paste idiots
>> lacking basic computer knowledge.
>
> Thanks for clarifying that you are a total waste of bandwidth.
He makes good points sometimes.
Sometimes he vents anger.
|
|