alt <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 20:45:22 +0200, Hadron Quark wrote:
>
>> alt <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 20:25:23 -0700, jews4linux wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>>> __/ [ Marshall ] on Sunday 13 August 2006 03:21 \__
>>>>>
>>>>> > jews4linux@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >> My partners and I set up a very small PC shop centrally located near a
>>>>> >> middle school, a college and a secondary school. Our only competition
>>>>> >> was a Frys shop about 2 KM away.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Nice try but three items confirmed a suspicion of this being a seminar
>>>>> > troll piece.
>>>>>
>>>>> Given the thread where I discussed this with Tim (as recently as last night),
>>>>> it's definitely a trolls who got an idea from that thread. Ignore! Also see
>>>>> the E-mail address. It's likely to be flatfish+++ who is an anti-Semite.
>>>>
>>>> I have no idea what you discussed with whom because I have you
>>>> killfiled with the exception of replies you make to my posts.
>>>> First of all you don't know me, but from your posts I pretty much know
>>>> what you are all about and it all ends in $$$$$$$$.
>>>> I don't believe for a millisecond that you are spamming COLA and now
>>>> alt.os.linux.suse, with your garbage for free.
>>>> You are making money off it and that's fairly obvious.
>>>
>>>
>>> You have proof for this assertion? (History lesson for the uninformed: Roy
>>> has been accused multiple times by "multiple people" -- really just the
>>> same person nymshifting -- as being a paid "linux astroturfer".)
>>
>> It did cross my mind too : why else would he insist on posting all these
>> useless tidbits seperately as opposed to a single summary for those
>> interested? Paid by post? It's a possibility : I cant think of any other
>> NG which would tolerate being flooded by so many posts when one would
>> suffice for those interested to browse at their leisure.
>
> Not everyone is motivated by Money. I realize that this is hard for many
> trolls and astroturfers to understand, but it's true.
>
> That's why we have missionaries, reverends/priests, volunteers and the
> like. OSS Advocates and coders are in the same camp. They do stuff because
> it feels good to contribute to society in a non-monetary fashion.
There is no need to post each headline as a seperate post. Only about 2
people reply anyway - one being Clark Kent or whoever it is.... the
other being Roy himself. To clarify : the advocacy is fine, but dont
flood the NG - post a single post containing all the links. The articles
of interest can then be discussed in their own threads if people find
sufficient interest which, in general, they dont.
|
|
