__/ [ alt ] on Friday 11 August 2006 07:22 \__
> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
> news:1239277.2J8xveyjiR@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
>
>> Busted! What happens when WGA attacks
>>
>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>| The entire program is couched in language that would make Orwell
>>| proud. I'd love to spend an hour in Redmond, locked in a room with
>>| the WGA team, so I could explain exactly how wrong their approach is.
>>| If I had my way, I'd tear down every existing web page and start
>>| over. Here's a hint: Stop treating every customer as if they were a
>>| thief.
>
> The problem is that many, many customers are thieves. Some don't even know
> it as their system came "pre-installed" with a lot of software.
>
> But the inconvenience is not worth it, IMO.
>
> WGA can get stuffed.
WGA is so good to Linux. I'm actually thinking about starting a port of WGA
to GNU/Linux (call it LGA and have it remind you that you are in a position
of advantage). If only SourceForge approved my application... and Microsoft
released the source code...
|
|
