Re: [News] At Beta 2, Vista Can't Yet Cope With Games

["Oliver Wong" <owong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

"Roy Schestowitz" <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message 
news:1212251.EcB5zPneG4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Microsoft doesn't yet play games on Vista
>
> ,----[ Quote ]
> | The firm has its Vista logo all over its boothm, but all the machines 
> that
> | we investigated were running Windows XP.
> |
> | Obviously, it is still not the right time to switch to Vista as things
> | might be not stable for current games. We hope that they can meet the
> | early 2007 schedules.
> `----
>
> http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=33924
>
> Who would have thought that SP3 would be less preferable than SP2?

   There you go again, referring to Vista as "SP3"... I thought you'd be 
more reasonable than that.

http://www.datasync.com/~rogerspl/Advocacy-HOWTO-6.html
<quote>
Refer to another product by its proper name. There's nothing to be gained by 
attempting to ridicule a company or its products by using "creative 
spelling". If we expect respect for Linux, we must respect other products.
</quote>

> Maybe
> Microsoft should adopt the Debian model and have "testing" and "stable". 
> Or
> Fedora and RHEL (the infamous myth).

   I believe they already have. Microsoft labels the current builds of 
Vista as "beta".

   - Oliver