Mark Kent wrote:
> begin oe_protect.scr
> High Plains Thumper <hpt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
> > Mark Kent wrote:
> >> High Plains Thumper espoused:
> >>> John A. Bailo wrote:
> >>>> High Plains Thumper wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Thus, content of anti-Linux nature that is short of consideration of a
> >>>>> question in open and usually informal debate on defending, supporting,
> >>>>> promoting advantages, helpfulness and happiness Linux brings is
> >>>>> inappropriate per charter.
> >>>>
> >>>> Even the Constitution has Amendments.
> >>>
> >>> Your point?
> >>
> >> His point is that he knows he shouldn't be here, and he'd like to change
> >> the charter, but he can't.
> >
> > He is an enigma. I used to think he was reasonable, but lately he has
> > turned troll.
> >
> > In reality, those who want another group, say alt.comp.os.linux.advocacy
> > where one can flame away, there are ways to propose, solicit input and make
> > it happen. However, that would require work.
> >
>
> You're quite right, of course. I also suspect that it would not be
> successful, too. In fact, I would imagine that our trolls wish to be
> here specifically because of Roy S, Roy C, Rex B, Spike, Jim, Arachnid,
> HPT, Peter K etc. etc.
Maybe if the #10 Troll Feeder *nudge nudge* didn't keep feeding them,
then they wouldn't be here.
|
|
