On 2006-12-06, Erik Funkenbusch <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Dec 2006 12:44:37 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>
>> http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.microsoft.com%2Fproducts%2Fexpression%2Fen%2Fweb_designer%2Fdefault.mspx
>> http://tinyurl.com/y8sxns
>>
>> 70 errors.
>>
>> It's like buying shoes from a barefooted man. Or taking financial advice from
>> RMS...
>
> Don't be stupid.
>
> Do you *REALLY* want to start this kind of deal? Let's look at some
> prominant open source web sites, shall we?
>
> http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F
>
> Google, 99 errors.
>
> http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.redhat.com%2F
>
> Red Hat, 20 errors.
>
> http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ubuntu.com%2F
>
> Ubuntu, 23 errors.
>
> http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.digg.com%2F
>
> digg, 30 errors.
Heh, that puts my site above both Google and Digg:
www.websterscafe.com
Result: Failed validation, 27 errors
--
<doogie_> linux takes shit and turns it into something useful.
<doogie_> windows takes something useful and turns it into shit
http://www.websterscafe.com
|
|
